User talk:USSVagrant

Welcome!

Hello, USSVagrant, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

TheRingess 08:34, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Super Kawaii.jpg to Wikipedia; I am afraid this image is unlikely to be acceptable for use on Wikipedia, since its original source is unknown. Please have a look at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images for discussion about the image; for more details on Wikipedia copyright policy, see Wikipedia:Copyright FAQ and Wikipedia:Fair use.

Regards, Mike Rosoft 16:22, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Wrecking Ball For BOHS.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Wrecking Ball For BOHS.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 01:06, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Aerial View of BOHS.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Aerial View of BOHS.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 01:43, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

^{Copied from my talk page. --Sherool (talk) 15:31, 21 March 2006 (UTC)}[reply]

I don't understand why everybody seems to want to remove images of my freaking school.

But that's besides the point. The image was taken from google, which as far as I'm aware, is free for use by anyone.

But the image has been deleted anyways. I'm sick of dealing with people who want to delete images of a school. For chrissakes', what is wrong with that? Vagrant 03:09, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can asure you it's nothing personal hundreds of images are deleted for this same reason every day. Insufficient source or copyright info that is. Roughtly speaking Wikipedia policy require uploaded images to either be under a copyleft/free content license or used under a fair use claim. If an image is free to use the uploader have to provide enough information to prove this, because by law everyting is basicaly copyrighted by default. Copyright holders have to actively waive rights and lift restrictions to theyr work to make it free, therefore free licensed images need some kind of "proof" that the image is indeed free. How common something is on the internett or the lack of a copyright notice does not make something free. Nether does a permission to use something for non-commercial or private reasons, or in fact even a permission to use on Wikipedia. The terms have to explicitly allow for commercial use, re-distribution by third parties and modifications to be considered free enough for use on Wikipedia. If something is not "free enough" then fair use can sometimes be applied. In the case of fair use the copyright holders should if at all possible be identified and credited, and additionaly a fair use rationale must be written for every page the image is used on and the image must otherwise meet the critereas mentioned at Wikipedia:Fair use#Policy.

Seeing as this particular image did not mention a source, or explain why it could be considered free for any purpose it was therefore deleted. Sometimes poorly labeled but legitemate images are deleted, wich is unfortunate, but if we can not verify the copyright info we can not risk keeping it, and I am actualy quite sure the Google map images are in fact fully copyrighted, at least theyr terms include "You may not use the imagery in any commercial or business environment or for any commercial or business purposes for yourself or any third parties.", and as explained abowe Wikipedia require images to be allowed for commercial use to be considered free. --Sherool (talk) 15:31, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding BOHS

I removed the content because it looked like vandalism to me, saying such as ' He is currently residing in El Paso, Texas with his little brother Brock where they are constructing fake rockets. ' 'Now, Aaron is studying underwater sewage removal off the coast of Kamchatka, Russia ' ' Class of 2001 - Casey Melton - For the majority of his years at, school Casey could be seen around campus with his fellow ruffians Josh Law and Zach Cavanaugh. Although he was not highly academic then, he now resides as the current Headmaster of Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. ' It's obvious rubbish and doesn't belong. Regards. --Shizane 07:38, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Students2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Students2.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 09:14, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

School article

Don't give it up! It could be a great article Victuallers 10:22, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Wrecking_Ball_For_BOHS.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Wrecking_Ball_For_BOHS.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 14:58, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sup Hunter

You need to put on a shirt. And shave. Then take another picture of yourself and upload that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.32.16.100 (talk) 22:43, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CIF Champs.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CIF Champs.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Cornerstone of BOHS.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Cornerstone of BOHS.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:31, 10 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 14:31, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Old High School.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Old High School.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:13, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Old School Front.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Old School Front.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:14, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Making Of The Wildcat.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Making Of The Wildcat.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:14, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Activity.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:19, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Academic Wing.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:22, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Brea Olinda High School.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:10, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CRI Genetics (July 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

None of the sources meet WP:ORGCRIT.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CRI Genetics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:CRI Genetics, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 06:50, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, USSVagrant! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 06:50, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:CRI Genetics concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:CRI Genetics, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Genetics Human concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Genetics Human, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Genetics Human

Hello, USSVagrant. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Genetics Human".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. kingboyk (talk) 06:46, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:CRI Genetics

Hello, USSVagrant. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "CRI Genetics".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 10:34, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:USS Vagrant.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:USS Vagrant.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ArchonBoi (talk) 08:55, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Students preparing to leave classroom, Brea Olinda High School (c 2006).jpg

The file File:Students preparing to leave classroom, Brea Olinda High School (c 2006).jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused and blurry photo of some students leaving a classroom. No encyclopedic purpose.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Matr1x-101 _{(Ping me when replying)} {_{user page} ^{(@ commons)} - _talk} 10:04, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]