User talk:Undertale&ParappaFan2001OnW

April 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Apple & Onion has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Apple & Onion was changed by Undertale&ParappaFan2001OnW (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95583 on 2018-04-05T22:10:32+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:10, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Toothy

Why are you so concerned with flagging socks of Toothy7942, who was indeffed four years ago? Is that an account you previously held? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:15, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reponse

Uh, no. He just made multiple vandal accounts because he kept on returning as the same person. So that why he is a claimed sock puppet. - Undertale&ParappaFan2001OnW (talk) 23:07, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. And that's why he was blocked four years ago. Why are you so interested in disruptive edits from four years ago? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:09, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not too sure about me being interested in disrupting edits from any year possible, but I think that he is the same account because he is the same vandal that usually creates fake show pages like The Buneary Show, Sunny Sky, etc. and also does some vandalism on some pages like removing redirects, that's why he is a claimed sockpuppet. - Undertale&ParappaFan2001OnW (talk) 02:42, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not asking why you think he's a sockpuppet, I'm asking why you, someone who's ostensibly been around since March 2018, know about these articles from all those years ago? It's highly unusual for any new editor to have any knowledge about hoax articles created years ago, or to express any interest in tagging sockpuppets who were disruptive years in the past. Most new editors just focus on improving articles, so your interest in this area is very confusing. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:50, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of programs broadcast by YTV, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.15.124.52 (talk) 02:45, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at List of programs broadcast by YTV shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.15.124.52 (talk) 02:52, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brighton Launch Adult Program.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brighton Launch Adult Program.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brighton School Canada.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brighton School Canada.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brighton Launch

Hello, Undertale&ParappaFan2001OnW

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Crystallizedcarbon and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Brighton Launch, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion. The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now invisible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Crystallizedcarbon}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 21:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brighton Launch for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brighton Launch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brighton Launch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BonkHindrance (talk) 00:51, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. – Frood (talk) 01:49, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Brighton Launch. Praxidicae (talk) 01:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:59, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 18:24, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brighton Launch Adult Program.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brighton Launch Adult Program.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:49, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]