User talk:Vanth9

Welcome!

Hi Vanth9! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help a–t the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! clpo13_(talk) 06:07, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm KidAd. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Elise Stefanik seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. KidAd • SPEAK 04:32, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Hello, I'm Dylan620. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Ted Wheeler seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dylan620 (talk) 03:57, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Charles the Bald have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Charles the Bald was changed by Vanth9 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.967608 on 2021-11-23T21:05:01+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Charles the Bald. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wham2001 (talk) 21:18, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

but it was a funny video, especially 0:19 Vanth9 (talk) 21:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:27, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vanth9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

cmonbruh why would you ban me, i made like 10 constructive edits.. just because i put a trihard video on an article doesn't mean i'm a vandal

Decline reason:

No, your acts of vandalism mean you're a vandal. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 04:43, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vanth9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

bruh i only made 6 vandalism edits... jannies are supposed to give me 4 warnings before banning me too, this is tyranny

Decline reason:

You do not have a right to warnings. PhilKnight (talk) 08:23, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.