Jump to content

User talk:Vickymehta03

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]
Hello, Vickymehta03, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Vickymehta03, good luck, and have fun.NgYShung huh? 10:22, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ananya Birla (November 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Yash! was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Yash! 07:51, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Vickymehta03, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Yash! 07:51, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kaabil critical response ordering

[edit]

Hi there, re: this, why did you put all the negative reviews at the bottom of the critical response section? How does this order present an appropriate picture of the overall critical response for the film? I've opened a discussion about this at Talk:Kaabil#POV flag and you are invited to participate. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:55, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Michelle Rodriguez

[edit]

Please note that, per WP:RS/IMDb, IMDb is not considered a reliable source and should not be used in citations. Thanks! DonIago (talk) 21:27, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback. But I had just replaced a dead link I suppose. Vickymehta03 (talk) 08:59, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Toppr has been accepted

[edit]
Toppr, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Vermont | reply here 12:17, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Toppr for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Toppr is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toppr until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HighKing++ 15:25, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikhil Namit (Director) (October 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 10:32, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]