Jump to content

User talk:Vintagemischief

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2024

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vintagemischief (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

your reason here 'I’m using my sandbox to edit for the new layout of Margot Robbie awards page. Isn’t that what it was used for? Im really confused why I was blocked. I saw the layout from a different sandbox so I copied and pasted it but it had Harry Potter awards attached to it which is weird since she isn’t in Harry Potter. So I wasn’t going to us it, but it had all Robbie’s awards on it, but not the same layout. But I was going to edit it since Robbie’s awards page changed to a different layout. I thought I could try and fix it before I put it straight on Robbie pages and edit it there. I thought sandbox were used for that reason, but I guess not. If I ever get unblock I will just go straight and edit it on the actual page. Sorry.

Decline reason:

None of this is relevant to your block. Yamla (talk) 13:19, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vintagemischief (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here I would like my account unblocked or unbanned, whatever one it’s called, it’s blocked but it’s more of a banned. Anyways, I’m not 100% sure why I was blocked, but it says something called sockpuppet. It says I’m a sockpuppet of an account called Vintagemi. I have only created one account, and have no relation to that account besides the name, which I found my username on tiktok and thought it was a cute. I don’t understand how that account is connected to mine, other than username? I just don’t understand? If I’m getting blocked because of a close username to account, then y’all should block / banned other accounts with close username, because they may actually be doing the sockpuppet thing that I’m being accused of.

Decline reason:

My use of the checkuser tool confirms that you have abused multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 14:33, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Vintagemischief (talk) 14:12, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vintagemischief (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here 'I have only created one account and that is this one. I don’t understand what I did wrong, how have I abused multiple accounts when I have only had this one. I do share this device with my little sister so she may have created that other account but that is the only explanation that I can think off because I didn’t created or abuse those multiple accounts that I’m being accused of. So I would appreciate it if I can have account unblocked because I haven’t done anything wrong.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. Are you seriously trying to tell us that the Vintagemi account, on the same IP as this one, making the same sort of edits as this one, is unreleated? --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 15:04, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Vintagemischief (talk) 14:49, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vintagemischief (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here Why wouldn’t I be serious? I have no idea who Vintagemi, we share similar usernames but like I stated above I found my username from a tiktok account. You guys have the wrong person. I have ran into multiple people that are actually abusing multiple accounts but I’m the one being blocked / banned? Unbelievable.

Decline reason:

Interesting story, but not a believable one. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:14, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Vintagemischief (talk) 15:23, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]