User talk:Virs1

June 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Ramanuja, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 06:10, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need to compare with Christian authors, western authors or make references. Ramanuja, does not need a western writer's endorsement! Virs1 (talk) 01:11, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of reliable sources[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ramanuja. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.Asterix757 (talk) 22:07, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit is Vandalism! Stop you appear to be a troll! Stop this religious harassment ! Virs1 (talk) 22:09, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And, you need to be banned from Wiki, This a page about Ramanuja not Christian or Western scholars! I will lodge a complaint Virs1 (talk) 22:10, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Asterix757 (talk) 22:33, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am escalating you as a harraser! You are edit harrasing others and an entire religion Virs1 (talk) 22:46, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For example, edit warring over how exactly to present encyclopedic content is not vandalism. Virs1 (talk) 22:50, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are removing scholar references, and persisting in that, despite several warnings, this is vandalism. Another way should have been to stop and change the way to present, but you didn't. Asterix757 (talk) 22:56, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please move your references to external references section. You are misrepresenting information and that is incorrect Virs1 (talk) 22:57, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These are not "my references". Asterix757 (talk) 22:59, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to want to add your Western scholars, please add to external references! And cite copyrighted content there. Virs1 (talk) 23:01, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They belong to external references! Not speak about Ramanuja's influence! Virs1 (talk) 23:02, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Virs1 (talk) 23:04, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 03:43, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Virs1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have corrected a factual error regarding swastika on its page, if you allow this I will consider Wiki as racist against the Hindu religion! Original author had incorrectly stated information, I hope you don't propogate misinformationVirs1 (talk) 19:14, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You're not going to get yourself unblocked by making racism accusations in your unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:04, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am here to build a factually correct encyclopedia! If you don't unblock me now, I am done with wiki since you propogate misinformation! Fyi- I have donated to Wiki over the last 5 years, with the hope you will share the correct information. Not just racially biased information! Virs1 (talk) 19:17, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The old withdrawal-of-donations-because-you-won't-let-me-push-my-POV formula. Talkpage access revoked. Use WP:UTRS if you wish to appeal again. Bishonen | tålk 20:36, 22 August 2020 (UTC).[reply]