User talk:VukMNE
June 2021
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 11:15, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
VukMNE (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
First of all, let me say that I apologize if I broke any rule by Wikipedia. However, I think you are unaware of the situation happening in Montenegro. We are a nation of just half a million people, while our neighbors from Serbia have a population of approximately 10 million people including diaspora. Our history is being stolen from us, and is being rewritten by Serbian nationalists. How on Earth is it possible that they claim that the rulers of Montenegro were all Serbs? How on Earth is it possible that they claim that Petar I was a metropolitan and priest of Serbian Orthodox Church, when such a thing didn't exist until 1921 in Montenegro, when it was violently introduced by Karadjordjevic dynasty. How on Earth is Wikipedia letting this happen? By punishing only one side, you are doing big disservice to the peace. Please, remove this block, and I will attempt to put sources in future corrections.
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 15:37, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. WCMemail 11:25, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
W Just do your job, I don't care at this point. We will create our separate Wikipedia
- Good luck with that. Don't be editing other editors' posts again. Drmies (talk) 14:43, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
- Ha, in hindsight that's funny. I was pointing at this, of course--right before I edited your post, because you did not do the unblock request right (no administrator will see it unless the instructions are followed). Drmies (talk) 14:48, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
VukMNE (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I believe that the block you gave me fullfilled it's purpose. I understand reason for which I was blocked. I felt that it was unjust that false claims were written about Petar I Petrovic Njegos, and I wanted to correct them as soon as possible. In future, I will document my changes, and provide sources for them. I think you are aware that Wikipedia became a common playground for nationalists who want to manipulate the facts. I understand, that the way I edited stuff on the related page, led you to believe I have bad intentions.
Finally, I want to ask you to repeal this block from my account, or at least set a deadline to it. I promise I will not make such edits in future.
I believe you should reconsider your decision about blocking me from editing a related page, and give me a fair chance to document why changes I made are necesarry. I may have been led by emotions to edit the false claims as quickly as possible, and I think now I deserve the chance to argument why the related article needs to be changed.
Decline reason:
I think that the block is still serving it's purpouse. See: [1]. You need to stop edit warring before you end up site-blocked. !ɘM γɿɘυϘ⅃ϘƧ 05:14, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Your unblock request
[edit]I'm not an admin so cannot directly review your unblock request. But considering it is only a partial block from a single article I think getting it reduced at this time is likely to be hard. You've already shown you have difficulty editing the article directly without causing problems. You finally started a discussion on the article talk page, but I think starting a discussion 21 minutes after you made an unblock request counts for very little. You could have done so at any time, and it's clearly needed for any advance on the dispute, so why did you put the cart before the horse and ask for an unblock from the article before you'd even start a discussion? Further while it was several hours before your unblock request and you seem to have stopped for now, you started edit-warring in a different article (Montenegrins). If I were you, I'd withdraw the unblock request and concentrate on discussing changes to Petar I Petrović-Njegoš on the article talk page. I'd also stop all edit warring, probably restrict myself to 0RR, on all Balkan dispute areas for now. If you're able to demonstrate an ability to successfully come up with improvements to that article via discussion, and other articles in the dispute area via discussion and direct editing without edit-warring, then I'm sure an unblock request for Petar I Petrović-Njegoš will be easily granted. Nil Einne (talk) 01:29, 6 June 2021 (UTC)