User talk:Waldoggy

This is Waldoggy's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

January 2009

please discontinue your censorship of sourced material in the baskin bio. if you would like to add additional sourced material, then please do. if you are the subject of the article, please identify yourself as such (according to WP policy), and make comments on the talk page, which indicate your intention and reasoning. --96.224.10.44 (talk) 02:09, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Roberta Baskin/Waldoggy - please discontinue your censorship/ this is your second warning. --96.224.10.44 (talk) 06:13, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ms. Baskin: you censorship may very well become the "news" ... Please discontinue and note that in Wikipedia, sources are what matters, not a subject's view of themselves. --96.224.10.44 (talk) 03:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting that you think that a sourced lawsuit about Ms. Baskin's defamation shouldn't be included, or the fact that she makes a living doing "gotcha" journalism, as evidenced by numerous sources. Calling this woman a "journalist" is a joke; it's the tabloid version of journalism whose only objective is to achieve ratings by scaring viewers. But then again since WP user: "rbaskin" (who could that be?) who has since transformed into the sock "waldoggy", wrote the initial puff piece/self promotion, then who would expect this piece to be any more objective or honest than the tabloid crap on their show. --96.224.10.44 (talk) 17:16, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, let's get a direct source: a quote from Baskin's boss at WJLA about the defamation lawsuit, and they should also comment on how Baskin is attempting to edit her own bio on WP, a clear ethical violation of journalistic principles. --96.224.10.44 (talk) 02:34, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Roberta Baskin. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. AnyPerson (talk) 02:58, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jake_Wartenberg&diff=263959645&oldid=263956062 indicate that you are biased, and are either the subject or have a close personal relationship to the subject, since you know that she is searching for a job, and therefore are trying to puff up her bio. I will be pursuing a fair article through the appropriate means. --96.224.10.44 (talk) 03:17, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 03:54, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. --VS ^talk 06:34, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

conflict of interest

if you are the subject or are married to the subject (as it appears) then you should disclose that information, according to WP policy. --96.232.31.191 (talk) 21:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Empatica, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Waldoggy/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Waldoggy/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 14:22, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Waldoggy! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 14:22, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Waldoggy! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 22:27, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]