User talk:Well..no..okay

April 2018

Hello, I'm Simplexity22. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Urangan Pier— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Simplexity22 (talk) 15:59, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Urangan Pier, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The Drover's Wife (talk) 05:38, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Well..no..okay/sandbox

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:Well..no..okay/sandbox, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cahk (talk) 07:38, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:27, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Well..no..okay (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not believe this ban is valid, first of all there was no actual reason for the ban and i hadnt vandalised or changed any pages but still got a ban. Now, i know and believe that my first warning was right because i had vandalised a page but, the ban that i have received had no reasoning and did not state the changes i made (of which i didn't). Thank you. Well..no..okay (talk) 14:29, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Incoherent unblock request, multiple instances of vandalism. Yamla (talk) 14:31, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yamla what are my other instances of vandalism