User talk:Wenhang Wang

AfC notification: Draft:Ash Nom DePlume has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ash Nom DePlume. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 08:28, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Dear Robert:

Thank you for your feedback. Maybe I am approaching this incorrectly. This is my first attempt to contribute to Wikipedia. I am sure I am making many first time mistakes. Thank you for your patience.

Concerning your comments which based on the standards appear to be valid objections. I am not sure that I could make the argument that pen name of Ash Nom DePlume this will make the sales or notable figure criteria. With only a few reviews and not appearing on a best sellers listing sales, are not going to qualify. I am unaware of any universities using his works in classes, or being widely quoted, literary awards and such.

I read a hard copy copyright filing copy of the Psionicist Guild and found the concept of a fictional text book interesting and possibly unique, not to mention standing the test of time on a couple of predictions. Later I gained access some other works as the author and I share a common friend, though I can't say I know him. Which reminds me I should post my reviews of the three books I fully read.

Ash does keep developing what as near as I can determine "First in Literature" items, approaches, or plot devices. Since, I cannot find any references of the prophetic historical fiction, or a text book from the future as a historical fiction done before. This was noteworthy but wasn't enough to get me to try this years ago. Then recently I saw that Ash wrote another book with a Literary First about the alcoholic treatment called the Sinclair Method. In regard to both of these items I cannot find any record of them being done before Ash's work. It seems I keep catching a largely unknown author on the way up, or a piece of history as these appear to be literary first.

Based on the Wikipedia’s criteria of sales and notable works as I understand them, I don't think this author has satisfied those criteria, but they are interesting stories, and seem to be on the cutting edge of history for originality in never been done before.

I do think, the status of two literary first is deserving of being historically notable and thereby deserving of consideration which is what got me thinking that there should be a Wikipedia entry for Ash Nom DePlume. Which why I am trying this as my first submission. is there a category for consideration under literary first?

Please advise, Wang

Wenhang Wang, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Wenhang Wang! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Ash Nom DePlume

Hello, Wenhang Wang. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ash Nom DePlume".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:08, 8 August 2019 (UTC)