User talk:Wiki00025

March 2022

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Elizabeth Cann, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 02:06, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please put an edit summary with your edits, to explain why you are making changes. Your edits have been reverted because it was not clear to other editors that they were an improvement. _signed,Willondon (talk) 03:36, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please add an edit summary with your edits, to explain why you are making changes. Your edits have been reverted because it was not clear to other editors that they were an improvement. _signed,Willondon (talk) 15:20, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And please see WP:NOTWEBHOST. Drmies (talk) 01:03, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please add an edit summary with your edits, to explain why you are making changes. Your edits have been reverted because it was not clear to other editors that they were an improvement. _signed,Willondon (talk) 14:20, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Respond to requests to explain why you keep removing information from the Elizabeth Cann article. Either that, or stop doing it. Further editing like this will be considered disruptive. _signed,Willondon (talk) 14:27, 17 March 2022 (UTC) P.S. You can also respond at the article talk page, where I've started a discussion. _signed,Willondon (talk)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Wiki00025

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Wiki00025 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Adakiko (talk) 09:59, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Continuing problems

So far almost all of your editing has consisted of repeatedly creating a page which does not appear to have relevance to building the encyclopaedia, and most of your other editing has consisted of repeatedly removing material from an article, without any explanation. Moreover, you have continued in the same way despite numerous messages from editors asking you for explanations, and a message explaining that use of a user page for purposes unrelated to work for Wikipedia is unacceptable. Almost all of us, when we start editing Wikipedia, know little or nothing about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, so nobody can be blamed for starting out doing things that are contrary to policies and guidelines that they don't know about. However, continuing to do the same things after being told about the relevant policies and guidelines is a different matter. If you continue in the same way you will be blocked from editing by an administrator. JBW (talk) 10:34, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The next time you remove content without explaining why, you may be blocked from editing. _signed,Willondon (talk) 16:55, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Adakiko, JBW and Willondon. For me, almost all of this user's edits are very annoying. Published editing without edit summary, did not response talk page, made some disruptive editing, and creating lists on user page with unclear purposes. There were some registered and suspect anon accounts that this user use: sockmaster User:Abdulaziz999982; User:Wiki00023, User:Wiki00024, IP 125.164.9.33, and 125.164.13.21, 125.164.35.172 . Stvbastian (talk) 20:27, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki00025's user page has been deleted twice, and the same content is being added again. Don't know why it's not part of an article or a draft. Adakiko (talk) 22:40, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent unconstructive editing, using multiple accounts, without taking any notice whatever of numerous messages, on several user talk pages, from editors expressing concerns.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of the talk page of your original account: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. JBW (talk) 11:30, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]