User talk:Wikidemo14

August 2013

Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Thalaivaa because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 13:07, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Thalaivaa. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 13:19, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:MelbourneStar. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 10:40, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:MelbourneStar, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 06:28, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jilla

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Jilla, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 15:29, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jilla. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Arjayay (talk) 18:59, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. DMacks (talk) 23:15, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]