User talk:Wikimanting

The Ska Vengers

Hi @Wikimanting, I reverted your edits on The Ska Vengers page, and you went ahead and reinserted the same content. This is called edit warring, and it is not permitted on Wikipedia. I understand that you may be in the process of creating new pages and so wish to also create red links, but at the moment, you are making two different links for presumably the same artist. Please make sure that your edits are constructive, follow Wikipedia policies, and above all, don't insist on pushing your edits after another editor has reverted you. Each Wikipedia article has its own talk page, which is where you can discuss disagreements or any other issues you may have pertaining to a page you are editing. Thank you. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 03:52, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. I did not realize I reverted another editors work, and thought maybe my last edit did not get saved so I edited it the second time. How do you link the same artist that has been spelt two different ways on The Ska Vengers page to the same artist page? Wikimanting (talk) 21:14, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, is there one correct spelling of the artist's name? Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 03:54, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes the artist's name is Diggy Dang.

Real name is Raghav Dang

The artist page draft is here: Draft:Diggy Dang Wikimanting (talk) 21:14, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since the draft page is under the name Diggy Dang, if you want to link it using his real name, it would look like this: Raghav Dang. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 01:54, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah got you. Is it possible for you to make this edit on The Ska Vengers page? I am afraid I might do something that is not permitted. Wikimanting (talk) 14:58, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should give it a shot. What's the worst that can happen if you make a mistake? ;) Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 15:35, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Diggy Dang (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Scope creep were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Coverage isn't the best. Nothing on social media or the streaming sites. Possibly very early days.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Diggy Dang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

scope_creep^Talk 08:46, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikimanting! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! scope_creep^Talk 08:46, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Diggy Dang has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Diggy Dang. Thanks! scope_creep^Talk 08:48, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Diggy Dang

Hello, Wikimanting. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Diggy Dang, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:05, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Diggy Dang

Hello, Wikimanting. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Diggy Dang".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:42, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]