User talk:WikimproverGlobal

June 2023

Thank you for contributing to the article Phishing. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 13:11, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Dear MrOllie,

Thank you for reviewing my contribution to the article on Phishing. I understand and appreciate Wikipedia's commitment to maintaining a high standard of reliability and verifiability through the use of credible sources. I would like to address your concerns regarding the addition of H9CK.com as a source and explain why I believe it to be relevant and reliable.

Firstly, I would like to clarify that H9CK.com is not a blog, personal website, or a source with a poor reputation for fact-checking. It is a reputable cybersecurity website that specializes in providing information and resources related to online security threats, including phishing attacks. The website is known for its accurate and up-to-date coverage of cybersecurity topics and is trusted by many professionals in the field.

The specific article on H9CK.com that I cited in my contribution provided valuable insights into the latest phishing techniques and strategies employed by cybercriminals. It discussed various real-life case studies, analyzed phishing campaigns, and offered recommendations on how to prevent falling victim to such attacks. The information presented in the article was supported by well-documented evidence, including data from reputable security firms and organizations.

Furthermore, the inclusion of H9CK.com as a source was relevant to the context of the article on phishing. As phishing attacks continue to evolve and become more sophisticated, it is essential to provide readers with comprehensive and up-to-date information from reliable sources. H9CK.com offers unique insights and analysis that complement the existing content and enhance the overall quality of the article.

I fully understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and I assure you that my intention was to contribute valuable and verifiable information to the article. If you still have concerns about the reliability of H9CK.com as a source, I would be more than happy to discuss and explore alternative sources that meet the required standards.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. I am open to any further guidance or suggestions you may have to improve the reliability and accuracy of the article.

Sincerely,

WikimproverGlobal WikimproverGlobal (talk) 16:48, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

It's clearly a self published content marketing blog. It is not a usable source to Wikipedia. You should stick with peer-reviewed journal articles or published books from major publishers as citations. MrOllie (talk) 17:33, 2 June 2023 (UTC)