User talk:WiktionariThrowaway

Welcome!

Hello, WiktionariThrowaway, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Leng chi tu, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Reywas92^Talk 18:23, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Leng chi tu

The article Leng chi tu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive sources. Just because you found a website with a recipe doesn't mean this particular preparation of Rabbit#As_food_and_clothing is notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 18:23, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Leng dan bei

The article Leng dan bei has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lemonaka (talk) 06:01, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your concerns, but I literally started writing this article 1 minute ago, and I'm tweaking it. Thanks. WiktionariThrowaway (talk) 06:01, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@WiktionariThrowaway You'd better work on draft space first. It will both save you and other's effort. I was patrolling on new page feeds and unfortunately got your article. Lemonaka (talk) 06:09, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Will remember for next time. WiktionariThrowaway (talk) 07:28, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Leng dan bei moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Leng dan bei, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:07, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]