User talk:Worldlyo 0wisdom

December 2013

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Please read Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 134#Bolding of major roles for more information. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 22:23, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

I've just read the article right before I received your message anyway. Sucks that I've spent more than 2 hours on this before receiving any notice. WW

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Daisuke Hirakawa, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. --DAJF (talk) 23:40, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kazuya Ichijō, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ze (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Bolding of roles in VA articles

Hello. I just reverted your changes to two articles in which you bolded some of their roles. (Tomokazu Sugita and Jun Fukuyama) This format has been deprecated since this discussion. If you bolded roles in any other articles, please revert them by yourself. Happy editing. ー HigherFive〈Ｃ | Ｔ〉 23:29, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Daisuke Namikawa, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --DAJF (talk) 00:16, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kōsuke Toriumi may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * ''[[Jounetsu no Young Man]'' (Nakagami)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:45, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Daisuke Hirakawa may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *''[[Saudade (novel|Saudade]]'' (Robert)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:59, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kōji Yusa may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[[Saudade (novel|Saudade]] (Yukinari Shizuka)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:00, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Isshin Chiba may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *''[[Chikatetsu no Inu]'' (Shinoda)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:00, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tatsuhisa Suzuki may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *''[[Gomennasai to Ittemiro]'' (Tobita)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:04, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Susumu Chiba may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *''[[Denkou Sekka Boys]'' (Kitami)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:28, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ken Narita may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * ''[[Seikimatsu Tantei Club]'' (John Garidebu)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:18, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For working on Japanese voice actors. All the best, Rich Farmbrough, 21:59, 12 April 2014 (UTC).

April 2014

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kōsuke Toriumi, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. DAJF (talk) 10:33, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Shin-ichiro Miki. Thank you. DAJF (talk) 08:05, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

A suggestion on how to improve voice actor articles

Hi. I see you are interested in improving Japanese voice actor and actress articles on Wikipedia. However, rather than simply copy & pasting listings from ANN, which in case you didn't know is not actually considered a reliable reference source for Wikipedia articles, could you perhaps instead consider being more selective and actually try and find reliable sources for the information you are adding? That would make Wikipedia a much more valuable reference source, rather than simply turning it into a mirror of ANN. I see you have been editing here for a few years now, but please take the opportunity to re-read the guidelines relating to articles about living persons at WP:BLP, and make a greater effort to provide reliable sources. I really hope you can make the effort. Thanks. --DAJF (talk) 08:38, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

First of all, I want to clarify that all of my editing on Wikipedia has nothing to do with ANN and thus is NOT a 'copy & pasting listings from ANN' editing action. Secondly, I understand the point being made and will try to comply with the regulations as best as I can; however I must also raise the question that if such un-'reliable' and un-'selective' method was not permitted in the first place, why is EVERY page about Japanese voice actors and actresses here in wikipedia following the same structure? As far as I can see, ALL of those pages consist of listings of works, AND there aren't any more than 5 sources listed in each page most of the time. Why isn't there anything being done to all those pages? It feels like my editing is the only thing being targeted at the moment, while I was simply following the existing preceding trend. Please consider this as well, and I would really appreciate it if this somewhat injustice could be better resolved. --Worldlyo 0wisdom (talk) 09:57, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for responding. If the information is not from ANN (which is good news), can you please include a link to the source you used in future when you add details to the articles? That will help other editors (and readers) verify the information added, something that is necessary for Wikipedia articles. I'm sorry you feel that your editing is being targeted, but that may be because you have edited a lot of similar voice actor articles recently. I know I and other editors have pruned unsourced stuff from a lot of other similar articles, which I don't think you have been involved in, so it's not something exclusive to you. I agree that there are certainly a lot of poorly written and poorly sourced articles out there, but that doesn't mean we can just add to that number (See the essay "WP:Other stuff exists" on the subject). If you are focusing your attention on voice acting articles and come across one that don't conform to the basic guidelines (e.g. regarding "Wikipedia:Verifiability" and also "Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lists of works", then please get stuck in and prune the unsourced trivia and add sources where you know they are available. That is what the articles really need more than anything right now. Thanks for any help you provide. --DAJF (talk) 14:10, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Okay, thank you for your time and the explanation; I will keep this in mind when editing in the future. Hopefully things will work out for the best. --Worldlyo 0wisdom (talk) 15:00, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)