User talk:Wroughtg

Welcome!

Hello, Wroughtg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Image copyright problem with Image:Rtn1 logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Rtn1 logo.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:48, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Rodney Howard-Browne. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Your edits included an enormous volume of promotional text taken directly from the Revival Ministries International website, in violation of numerous Wikipedia policies in addition to being a blatant copyright violation. Please study Wikipedia core policies before making further edits. Mike Doughney (talk) 01:01, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Mike Doughney (talk) 01:58, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 12 hours for repeatedly reposting material in violation of copyright after being warned to stop. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Daniel Case (talk) 02:11, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wroughtg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was given the content from the owners.

Decline reason:

per my comments below --B (talk) 04:30, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

now explain how that is a violation.. what is your problem with this christian ministry? I will take this as far as I have to. You are Bias and this is not fare. Is it just the ministries that you deny access to?

Again, please read Wikipedia core policies before continuing to repost this material over and over, and repetitively removing balancing content including links to secular news articles. Wikipedia does not serve as a promotional vehicle for your use however you wish. Besides the copyright issues, this material violates Wikipedia guidelines because, among other reasons, it is written in a promotional tone and is basically incomprehensible to a general audience unfamiliar with evangelical customs and language. It's also apparent that you have a conflict of interest in this matter (see below). Mike Doughney (talk) 02:30, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mike your profile says you are an Atheist .. This is the only conflict of interest I see. I will take this as far as I have to to get this to be fare. It is also Ironic for an Atheist to be moderating religion. This has to stop.

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Also, don't forget to sign your comments using four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of each post. Mike Doughney (talk) 02:43, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good faith ? are you kidding me? There will be hundreds of complaints about this by this time tomorrow. It is clear why you have done this. So lets just take it a bit higher. You are in the wrong.

Have you read Wikipedia's official policies and guidelines, also known as five pillars, in particular, the part about neutral point of view? It might save you a bit of heartburn later on if you take time right now, while you are blocked from editing, and read those articles. Mike Doughney (talk) 02:53, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rodney Howard-Browne

Concerning adding information to this page, please note that Wikipedia uses the GNU Free Documentation License. It is a copyleft licensing agreement (meaning the GFDL runs with the material, derivatives and all) so the material cannot be here on WP and "© Copyright 2008 Revival Ministries International" at [1]. If you would like to have it released to this license please Wikipedia:Contact us. --maclean 01:29, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent conflict of interest

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Rodney Howard-Browne, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you.

I've noticed that you've stated that you "work with the ministry" in your edit summary here. This clearly implies that a conflict of interest exists. Mike Doughney (talk) 02:24, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Look just because I asked them for content does not mean I am in there church. I am editing content because no one els was. I would call that working with them not a conflict of interest. You Mike just have a problem with this guy. Dr. Browne.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Your statement that I "have a problem with this guy" indicates that you are assuming my edits are not made in good faith. This is not true, I have exhaustively explained the reasons for my edits, and user maclean (above) has attempted to explain the copyright issue to you, to no avail. Mike Doughney (talk) 02:36, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More on conflict of interest matter

I've received a Wikipedia e-mail from Wroughtg, the entirety of which is as follows. I have bolded a few particular words:

who do we have to go to for you to allow us to build this content on RMI? why do you not allow us to edit this subject? Is it personal? how can we get it done if you dont even let us get it started? please stop.This is not right.....

Who are the 'we' and 'us' referred to in this message? Should I assume that some other entity, other than Wroughtg personally, intends to edit this article? What might that entity be?

As for who you go to, there is no one in particular. But if you'd read up on how Wikipedia functions, starting with Wikipedia's core policies, you might know that already. Mike Doughney (talk) 03:46, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mike..

I think a lot of people are going to be interested to know that you make a habit to single out Evangelist wiki info as well as having your own sites dedicated to attacking the church. Have faith in your edits? that is what you said right?

www.doughney.com/ is one I am sure will show you are not impartial to religion.

You have no business editing evangelists pages.. I am going to expose your Bias editing..

wroughtg

The issue has nothing to do with theology. Wikipedia is not free advertising for your ministry or any other company or organization. There are two issues here, both of which prevent us from accepting this content. (1) We do not accept content offered under anything more restrictive than the GNU Free Documentation License. Anything with a restrictive copyright statement is removed on sight. (2) We adhere to a neutral point of view and do not publish press releases. Wikipedia is not a promotional tool. --B (talk) 04:30, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did not say, "have faith in [my] edits." I said, actually, I used a template that says, "we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors." You might want to read up on what the term "good faith" means if that is something that you are unfamiliar with. But before you do that, you might want to check out Wikipedia's core policies. Oh, and as for your insinuation that I "have no business editing evangeilsts pages," please take a look at the top of the main page, where it says, "the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit." That is, edit in accordance with those Wikipedia core policies that I again mention that you should get familiar with. And while I'm repeating myself, let me again insist that you "assume good faith in your dealings with other editors," including me. Mike Doughney (talk) 07:05, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at the contributions of Mike Doughney...., over 90% are targeted at Evangelicle Christians....

   * 06:33, 29 March 2008 (hist) (diff) List of defunct department stores of the United States‎ (→National and regional:  adds G.E.M.)
   * 06:29, 29 March 2008 (hist) (diff) List of defunct retailers of the United States‎ (→Office supply stores: add Paper Cutter)
   * 06:15, 29 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Creflo Dollar‎ (→Biography: removed redundant sentence and unsourced peacockery)
   * 06:10, 29 March 2008 (hist) (diff) List of defunct retailers of the United States‎ (→Warehouse clubs: wikilinked GEX/GEM; changed heading to include past membership stores (Fedco, Gemco, GovMart, GEM/GEX))
   * 05:35, 29 March 2008 (hist) (diff) G. E. M. Membership Department Stores‎ (add date of Koffler's involvement)
   * 05:32, 29 March 2008 (hist) (diff) G. E. M. Membership Department Stores‎ (adding Murray Koffler / Shopper's Drug Mart connection)
   * 05:17, 29 March 2008 (hist) (diff) m G. E. M. Membership Department Stores‎ (fix hidden tag)
   * 05:13, 29 March 2008 (hist) (diff) G. E. M. Membership Department Stores‎ (←Created page with '{{Infobox_Company | company_name = G.E.M. | company_logo = | company_type = discount membership store| foundat...')
   * 02:28, 29 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Memco‎ (categorization) (top)
   * 19:51, 28 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Ron Luce‎ (this needs a solid published cite, since this probably refers to other living people, per WP:BLP)
   * 19:39, 28 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention‎ (→User-reported: add user CityPages)
   * 19:35, 28 March 2008 (hist) (diff) User:Mike Doughney‎ (top)
   * 21:17, 27 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Franklin Graham‎ (Undid revision 201399393 by 65.100.7.123 (talk) rvv)
   * 18:02, 25 March 2008 (hist) (diff) m WMUC-FM‎ (→History: rm two extraneous words (tense adjustment))
   * 17:57, 25 March 2008 (hist) (diff) WMUC-FM‎ (→History: remove implied threat to WMUC; remove irrelevant commentary on WYPR's coverage area; softened assessment of change to WMUC's coverage (that's dependent on receivers and antennae))
   * 17:51, 24 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Jimmy Swaggart‎ (Undid revision 200493643 by Bohizzle (talk) rv uncited/commentary/POV)
   * 04:55, 20 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Jack Thompson (attorney)‎ (NPOV improvement)
   * 01:59, 19 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Apollo Quiboloy‎ (Undid revision 199149572 by 203.87.176.130 (talk) rvv)
   * 01:57, 19 March 2008 (hist) (diff) People Eating Tasty Animals‎ (Undid revision 199155189 by 208.102.249.93 (talk) rvv) (top)
   * 15:13, 18 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Billy Graham‎ (Undid revision 199079920 by 71.60.200.223 (talk) no, clearly, not "Bob")
   * 16:43, 17 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Battle Cry Campaign‎ (→Other criticism: restored context for quote reffering to previous ATF, not BattleCry) (top)
   * 14:05, 16 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Battle Cry Campaign‎ (→Other criticism: adds local pastor commentary from S.F. event)
   * 17:54, 15 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Battle Cry Campaign‎ (→Programs, activities and methods: adds secondary source cite for Joel Johnson's role with Teen Mania)
   * 16:55, 13 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Battle Cry Campaign‎ (→Major tenets: slight tense adjustment)
   * 07:19, 11 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Maranatha Campus Ministries‎ (→Christian Research Institute's report: fix wording)
   * 07:18, 11 March 2008 (hist) (diff) m Maranatha Campus Ministries‎ (→Beginnings: fix link)
   * 07:14, 11 March 2008 (hist) (diff) m Maranatha Campus Ministries‎ (→Notable members: fix link, spacing)
   * 02:28, 11 March 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:24.193.160.43‎ (uw-vandalism2 People Eating Tasty Animals) (top)
   * 02:25, 11 March 2008 (hist) (diff) People Eating Tasty Animals‎ (rv vandalism)
   * 06:40, 7 March 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Azumanga1‎ (→March 2008: uw-delete2 WAMF + misuse of minor edit marking)
   * 06:35, 7 March 2008 (hist) (diff) WAMF‎ (Restored verfied content removed without explanation; that was not a minor edit.)
   * 04:48, 6 March 2008 (hist) (diff) John Wimber‎ (→Teachings & Legacy: fixed redlink, link to wrong person, and disambiguated link)
   * 04:12, 4 March 2008 (hist) (diff) Walid Shoebat‎ (→Criticism: this implausible assertion needs something more than one blog entry to support it, per WP:BLP)
   * 18:37, 24 February 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Apostleship‎ (uw-npov3 Apostolic-Prophetic Movement) (top)
   * 18:35, 24 February 2008 (hist) (diff) Apostolic-Prophetic Movement‎ (→The Kansas City Prophets: removing phrase promoting individual church)
   * 18:34, 24 February 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Apostolic-Prophetic Movement‎ (→List removed from article: new section) (top)
   * 18:30, 24 February 2008 (hist) (diff) Apostolic-Prophetic Movement‎ (moved list to talk, removed mass of POV/unsourced material appended to article)
   * 04:16, 24 February 2008 (hist) (diff) Apostolic-Prophetic Movement‎ (cleanup-rewrite, obscure)
   * 04:07, 24 February 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Apostleship‎ (uw-npov2 Apostolic-Prophetic Movement)
   * 04:04, 24 February 2008 (hist) (diff) Apostolic-Prophetic Movement‎ (Revert to revision 177941352 dated 2007-12-14 20:07:33 by RussBot using popups)
   * 18:06, 16 February 2008 (hist) (diff) Pentecostalism‎ (Undid revision 191887879 by 72.27.104.144 (talk) rvv)
   * 15:07, 16 February 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Ted Haggard‎ (added top of page notaforum/message deletion warning; removed section "five-fold ministry" which nowhere addresses the article and is only serving as a magnet for such comments.)
   * 15:13, 15 February 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Myles Munroe‎ (tags; biography, charismatic wikiprojects) (top)
   * 13:54, 14 February 2008 (hist) (diff) Battle Cry Campaign‎ (→Programs, activities and methods: fleshed out subsequent pre-event rallies with cites; tense adjustment on curernt event)
   * 05:35, 14 February 2008 (hist) (diff) Myles Munroe‎ (honorary title not appropriate)
   * 15:21, 12 February 2008 (hist) (diff) User talk:Sethc87‎ (←Created page with '==Welcome== Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find ...') (top)
   * 14:26, 12 February 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Ron Luce‎ (top)
   * 14:18, 12 February 2008 (hist) (diff) Talk:Battle Cry Campaign‎ (→Defining position on Theocracy)
   * 12:55, 12 February 2008 (hist) (diff) m Digex‎ (→Video leader: wikilinks, minor fixes - yes, there's a wikipedia entry for the Bud Bowl...)
   * 03:52, 12 February 2008 (hist) (diff) 2007 Colorado YWAM and New Life shootings‎ (Undid revision 190812424 by 132.241.246.224 (talk) again, removing irrelevant categories)

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. Mike Doughney (talk) 06:24, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are an idiot. Closed mined uneducated idiot.. Your true face is evident. You obviously have an agenda here to attack Christians and you have proven that by spending all your time judging them.

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Mike Doughney (talk) 20:11, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Rtn1 logo.gif

Image Copyright problem

Hi Wroughtg!
We thank you for uploading Image:Rtn1 logo.gif, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 17:26, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]