User talk:XXGfHXx

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, XXGfHXx, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! bobrayner (talk) 01:33, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

August 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Dan56. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Life Is Good (Nas album), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Dan56 (talk) 02:49, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

October 2013[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Nubia, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 16:17, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Nubia[edit]

I presume you've removed the sourced text there twice, the first time logged out. Please stop doing this - you've given no explanation, it is reliably sourced and no one disputes it. Continuing to do this, especially with no rationale, suggests WP:VANDALISM. You also need to stop marking edits as minor. Even deleting unsourced text with a citation requested tag isn't a minor edit. Dougweller (talk) 16:19, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nsibidi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Script. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Moors, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page African. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Moors[edit]

Please could you explain the rationale for your current edits on the talk page? Pinkbeast (talk) 15:31, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Or in other words, and at Talk:Moors, show your sources meeting WP:RS (ie academic sources for this) stating that these people were definitely Moors. Our articles don't say they were. Doug Weller (talk) 15:46, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Sources[edit]

You really need to read WP:RS. For history and archaeological articles, websites rarely meet our critiera unless they are the websites of academic organisations, and sites such as quora.com definitely fail. I'm not saying our articles don't have such sources, but they shouldn't. Doug Weller (talk) 16:25, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, XXGfHXx. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)