User talk:Xinjia 21

Xinjia 21, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Xinjia 21! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:05, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Misplaced article[edit]

I noticed that you began to write an article at Wikipedia:Your first article. I have undone your edits there, because that's the help page. It is not a good place to submit content for the encyclopedia. I suggest that you look again at Wikipedia:Your first article and perhaps try the Article wizard. -- John of Reading (talk) 16:11, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017[edit]

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Daniel Ingram. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Per WP:MALPLACED, the disambiguation page should be at the base title, not at the "(disambiguation)" title. GeoffreyT2000 ^{(talk, contribs)} 14:18, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Drmies (talk) 12:42, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xinjia 21 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am requesting to unblock my account. I am not part of the "Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of BusInCordoba". I don't know them. I am just an editor who wanted to contribute in wikipedia in a good and nice way. Thanks for your consideration. Xinjia 21 (talk) 2:53 am, Today (UTC+2)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. No response in a month. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:42, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Drmies: I don't see this username at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BusInCordoba. What is the exact evidence of sockpupeptry? Vanjagenije (talk) 08:44, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- User:Vanjagenije, it's behavioral--I mentioned the editor in the COIN thread, I believe. What clinches it for me is the edits to PortaOne as well as the pattern of the editor's history--starting with mostly minor edits, then moving into a promotional article with a huge edit that adds sourcing and, very tellingly, company details that really aren't all that obvious, like the names of the CEOs. Such info, in my experience, is common among paid editors since all the bosses want their names in articles. And this is a somewhat odd link to stick in there: it's the kind of business directory that companies know and use, but regular editors not so much--five pages of a Google search for the company haven't produced it yet. Then there's the coding; it's not really that fancy, but infobox parameters and the "small" tags, that's just somewhat odd for someone who's made less than two dozen edits. Finally, PortaOne is of course an article created by that farm, so I'm interested in hearing the user's explanation for how they landed on that article and how they made the edits they made. Drmies (talk) 12:19, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]