User talk:Xobluediamondxo

Constance R Howard Wikipedia page has been approved after review, Congratulations Ms.Constance Howard and much success on your career. File:Gliderconstance.jpg

Speedy deletion of Prima Donna (album)

A tag has been placed on Prima Donna (album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 15:22, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Constance R Howard

An article that you have been involved in editing, Constance R Howard, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Constance R Howard. Thank you. AnyPerson (talk) 22:56, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Constance R Howard, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. AnyPerson (talk) 23:01, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such thing as "approved by Wikipedia". One editor, on their own regard, removed the speedy deletion tag, that doesn't prove that they or anybody else has "approved" the article. You must provide reliable sources as to her notability. Existence is not in question. Notability is. AnyPerson (talk) 00:01, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, blanking my nomination on the AfD page is vandalism. Please don't do that again. AnyPerson (talk) 00:02, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, linking to the defjam and Ethnicity models pages does no good. Please link to the pages about her. AnyPerson (talk) 00:03, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Constance R Howard

Don't remove other people's comments on Talk pages. AnyPerson (talk) 00:29, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Constance R Howard has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 13:09, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Constance R Howard. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Constance R Howard was changed by Xobluediamondxo (u) (t) deleting 7981 characters on 2009-01-27T13:11:58+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:12, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]