User talk:XxReflectionxX

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

XxReflectionxX, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi XxReflectionxX! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LibDutch Sockpuppet

Please create a sockpuppet investigation here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ASockpuppet_investigations

LibDutch's sockpuppet is User:ArabUAE. (Check the edit contributions of this user, they match up with DutchLib).

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.197.121.94 (talk) 20:31, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, having a sockpuppet results in an automatic permanent block from Wikipedia, so it is important that LibDutch faces the consequences of their actions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.197.121.94 (talk) 20:58, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I edited while logged out so it will be inappropriate for me to create a report.

I recommend you creating an account. It literally takes 1 or 2 minutes. XxReflectionxX (talk) 21:39, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User Sayersle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sayerslle is more experienced in wikipedia stuff and seems to be pretty annoyed at his POV pushing to, I recommend asking him also. XxReflectionxX (talk) 21:41, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Signing Comments

Thanks for clarifying things on the sock puppet case. Remember to sign your posts/comments with the 4 tildes, these things:

~~~~

IPinvestigates (talk) 00:26, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome. Thanks for the information too. XxReflectionxX (talk) 00:27, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 21:15, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]