User talk:Yiovy

May 2023

Hello, I'm OutsideNormality. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wyoming statistical areas have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. OutsideNormality (talk) 00:01, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the correction. Good day Yiovy (talk) 00:30, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Juniperus virginiana, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. While your changes seem well-intentioned, and some were OK, others removed useful content; all in all it's unclear why you removed all of it as you're not using edit summaries. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 19:04, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to hear that the edit I provided wasn't satisfactory. I do apologize for not providing a valid reason in the edit summary. since the text is describing a tree, I chose to structure the information in a way that highlights the different characteristics of the tree. For example, the first sentence describes the tree's physical appearance, and the second sentence describes the bark and leaves. By structuring the information in this way, I hoped to provide a clear and concise description of the tree's characteristics. Yiovy (talk) 21:28, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Fake fur. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 09:16, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Yiovy (talk) 09:24, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Valencell, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. [1] Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 00:17, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Bodiadub per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bodiadub. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 16:47, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]