User talk:Zv7db9s

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Zv7db9s, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 21:03, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to What the Health, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. - Mr X 🖋 22:17, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at What the Health, you may be blocked from editing. You have removed referenced material. Please discuss such changes on the talk page. Ifnord (talk) 22:24, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at What the Health shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ifnord (talk) 22:25, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Zv7db9s reported by User:MrX (Result: ). Thank you. - Mr X 🖋 22:55, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018[edit]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:10, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked you for 24 hours. Now, first, I do not care at all about the content in the article. I care about disruption. There is a process here, and you know what that is because I told you. When your block expires, use the talk page. You have good chances there. If you just try to force the article the way you want, it will not work. That never works. So, do the smart thing and discuss. Trust me, I've been here for ten years. I know. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:13, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Civility[edit]

Please be polite to others. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:47, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A quick question[edit]

It would be helpful to know if you are related to the documentary production in some way. You seem to have some expertise in the area. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:46, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Well, in the one day you've been here, and with 11 edits, you have managed to get yourself blocked, have edit warred, been uncivil, ignored a warning about being uncivil, been even more uncivil, and ignored my question about a possible conflict of interest.

I do not think you are here to help build this encyclopedia. I suspect you are probably here on behalf of the documentary, only to remove content that you see as unfavourable. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:59, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]