Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2006/Requests for adminship/Mathbot

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

Mathbot

Final: (5/7/1/1/1/1) - closed as unsuccessful (non-bureaucrat closure) by NotReallySoroka at 22:12, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, what can I say? I was stunned when I looked it up and saw Mathbot was marked as user instead of sysop. This is the man who's got 16,448 edits- 9,670 in article space-, who's been here for a year now, and who has filled our gaps in mathematical knowledge substantially! He's also a regular RfA contributor and knows the value of edit summaries. It's like this guy is a machine or something!! CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 00:44, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: Opposition is futile. Mathbot 00:42, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support

Strong support as nominator. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 00:44, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strongest Possible Support of course :) --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 02:16, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Support, without Mathbot there is no Wikipedia --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 07:00, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support the founder of Wikipedia would make a great admin. ems 14:31, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strongest Possible Support + 1 Wikipedia will crumble to the ground if this user does not becom an admin. --Phantom784 14:51, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Weak Oppose Candidate has no personality. Answers to questions boring. Septentrionalis 03:51, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - all editcounts (9670, 255, 2615, 441, 3397, 33, 39, 1) are non-prime. I can't support composite editors. It's not that I don't like you but I must be firm with my standards. (ESkog)^(Talk) 04:57, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: Uses edit summaries too much. TimBentley (talk) 05:59, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, at 16451 edits and 356 days old, this user is much too new and clearly not acquainted with Wikipedia policies and procedures. This user may be a sockpuppet as he keeps posting to RfAs and AfDs. I may support at 20000 edits. --Deathphoenix ON WHEELS ʕ 07:14, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, not enough talk: related pages, other then biting editors about edit summaries 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. Communications skills are important for an admin. — xaosflux ^Talk 13:41, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose who the hell is this guy?
Oppose - trolling on RfAs. Misza 13 ^{T C} 16:07, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Opppose. My bot says it will shoot directly for bureaucrat. Adminship is for whimps, it says. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 04:11, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose. This user is an obvious vandal - [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. His answers to the questions below also clearly demonstrate his intentions of using administrator priveleges for evil. -- Meni Rosenfeld (talk) 20:25, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep

Passes Google test with 24,700 hits. — Phil Welch (t) (c) 02:14, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do Not Delete. Sammy on Skids 03:52, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

$\mathbf {a} \times \mathbf {b} =\mathbf {\hat {n}} \left|\mathbf {a} \right|\left|\mathbf {b} \right|\sin \theta$

-- CAPS LOCK IS CRUISE CONTROL (FOR COOL) 09:21, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Baleeted

King of Hearts ^talk 00:30, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

Merge with Anus language. Herostratus 04:56, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Edit summary usage: 100% for major edits and 0% for minor edits. Based on the last 150 major and 0 minor edits in the article namespace. Not Mathbot 17:06, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

A: 0011100100 00111101010101001001 00100010010010 000010100001 010111101010 0011101011010101011101011001001001110100 0101001001 010101 1010101 10100001000010001 0101010100111010 10101

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A:100101011110101110100001001011110101010101 101001001001001000111101 1010101 10100010010011 101010101001001001 10101001001 101010001 101010100011010 1010 1010101001001001 10101

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: 001001001001001 101010010010 10101010101 010101001001 11100O10010 1001001l0010010 10010010Ol101 00100111010100100100 10101 1 10101 1000 1 010101001001 10100010

4 1001001001001?

A: Not at all.

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.