Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kinda El-Khatib

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Renaming the article is outside of AFD's scope. ✗plicit 23:41, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kinda El-Khatib

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. The sources are not valuable. Kadıköylü (talk) 22:23, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Kadıköylü (talk) 22:23, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Kadıköylü (talk) 22:23, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. Kadıköylü (talk) 22:23, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. Kadıköylü (talk) 22:23, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The simple assertion that "sources are not valuable" hardly covers the situation of a story widely covered in media. Charles Matthews (talk) 06:30, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SOCKSTRIKE -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 00:08, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Keep. the subject is meet with WP:GNG we have Significant coverage and Reliable and independent sources and and international sources such as BBC Arabic and Associated Press *https://apnews.com/2697086eabea3d0e77f0a2c2cb605442 and *https://apnews.com/article/israel-lebanon-michel-aoun-aeacebeacc8963872e6626343eed1fa9 and more --Dw Journalist (talk) 08:09, 29 January 2022 (UTC)— Dw Journalist (talk · contribs) is a confirmed sock puppet of علي أبو عمر (talk · contribs). [reply]
Comment.Who is Ali? I don't know him and did you read ? no attacks attacks Kadıköylü He is attacking me and the English admin User:Charles Matthews as if the TR user knows what he's doing more than ,a wiki admin for 20 years! and Do you know the en Wikipedia rules here more than Admin? This user must be banned , You must read and learn Wikipedia:Assume good faith --Dw Journalist (talk) 11:29, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It would be more helpful if everyone assumed good faith. Charles Matthews (talk) 11:21, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are right User:Charles Matthews but (Redacted), If these sources in the article are not independent and reliable? What are the reliable sources? Really weird--Dw Journalist (talk) 11:26, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This comes from a long-term abuser that called me a dog on Simple because I !voted delete on an AfD? We've passed the assuming good faith point a long time ago by now... ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 11:37, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

He insulted me in Trwiki, the admin hid the logs. Before being notable on Wikipedia, Ali needs to learn to communicate respectfully with people.--Kadıköylü (talk) 12:16, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Striking through the !vote of a block-evading, globally locked cross-wiki LTA. Girth Summit _(blether) 13:23, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I agree with User:Charles Matthews that this was too facile. There's sources for the person over a long enough period of time, from acceptable sources, that establish notability. Drmies (talk) 13:28, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
While I'm deeply uncomfortable with how this article came into being, that's a conduct issue rather than content, as long as this doesn't cross the bright-ish line of G5, and it doesn't. From what I can see based on the sources and some additional Googling, the trial of El-Khatib and subsequent proceedings are notable, but under WP:BIO1E I'm not seeing much evidence that she is. So, keep but move to Trial of Kinda El-Khatib or a similar title. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 00:07, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, but move to Trial of Kinda El-Khatib (or similar) per Tamzin. Miniapolis 00:34, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.