Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Joe's Null Bot 14
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was
Withdrawn by operator.
Operator: Joe Decker (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 20:35, Sunday, November 18, 2018 (UTC)
Function overview:
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automated
Programming language(s): Perl
Source code available: yes
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia_talk:Categorization#Purging_Category:Non-empty_disambiguation_categories
Edit period(s): Daily
Estimated number of pages affected: 1500
Namespace(s):Category
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No):No
Function details: Purges each category in Category:Disambiguation categories with the goal of flush empty disambiguation categories into Category:Wikipedia non-empty soft redirected categories. As implemented, this would be a parameter change to an existing function, most similar to task 5.
Discussion
[edit]Approved for trial (0 edits or 7 days). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. let us know how it goes. — xaosflux Talk 12:11, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks, it'll run about 1111 UTC the next seven days, will report back. --joe deckertalk 05:25, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- So, a funny thing happened on the way to the Bot Request. As near as I can tell (and this explains one or two other reports I was looking into), the underlying forcelinkupdate function may be broken. I'd recommend putting this on hold until there's clarity on T210307, or alternatively closing this and asking me to refile once it's addressed. *shrug* --joe deckertalk 20:40, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- @Joe Decker:Let's call this...
Withdrawn by operator. for now. Feel free to undo my close, and re-open this once you're ready. SQLQuery me! 01:01, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.