Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 July 20
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
July 20
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 13:03, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
misspelling; started correctly spelled Category:Junior-bantamweights
- Merge and delete per nom, as long as that doesn't imply they are kids (it's a weight measurement, right?). -Splash 17:48, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was rename --Kbdank71 13:01, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Should be simply Category:Sufis, as it is implied that if they have articles they are famous. - SimonP 03:41, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
- Rename per nom; don't include notability claims in category titles. -Splash 17:48, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- As an aside, should we stick List of famous Sufis up on VFD as it's redundant with the category? Sasquatch′↔Talk↔Contributions 00:15, July 21, 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 13:00, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Is this a joke? Delete. Gamaliel 03:35, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, I fear it is not a joke, much like the CfD below. -Splash 17:48, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Pavel Vozenilek 19:57, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
Category:Fictional characters who have operated Santa Claus' sleigh during a Christmas special
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 12:53, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I think this violates the "Can you write a few paragraphs about it?" and "Is it obvious why this category is there?" guidleines on Wikipedia:Categorization. What's next? "Category:Actors who have co-starred with Kermit the Frog"? "Category:Smurfs with multisyllabic names"? BrianSmithson 02:43, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Too narrow and not useful for general category structure. Aww, I really wanted to know who acted with Kermit :( ∞Who?¿? 03:13, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, but that's hilarious. -Splash 17:48, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. Pavel Vozenilek 22:41, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I think this would make a great list article; it would definitely make Wikipedia:Unusual articles. But delete as a category. I'm also surprised to find out that The Nightmare Before Christmas is a fictional character. Postdlf 17:39, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 12:50, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
We already have Category:Architecture by country. Eliot 01:26, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed Please see relevant categories mentioned by nom. This is a contintental category, with one child already cat'd in Category:Architecture by country. should be deleted. ∞Who?¿? 03:10, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, the cited cat appears to show that architecture is cat'd by country (for a discussion of how to name country-related cats, please see Wikipedia:Category titles, rather than discussing it here). -Splash 17:48, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep--there definitely can or will be a group of articles relating only to South Asian architecture; the country-articles or country-cats can still be members of Category:Architecture by country ~ Dpr 22:48, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, categorize by country, not by continent. Radiant_>|< 08:36, July 21, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. --Kbdank71 14:06, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- COMMENT if South Asia is considered as a cultural definition, then it should be allowable, as architecture is influenced by culture. Ofcourse, examples of architecture in such a category needs to be culturally identifiable, and not just geographically placed 132.205.44.43 14:57, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Ancient architecture are not bounded by the present-day political boundaries (which are relatively young in this part of the world), but culture. Articles on such topic can be placed in this category. — Instantnood 15:20, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.