Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/American exceptionalism/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted by GrahamColm 10:01, 4 August 2013 (UTC) [1].[reply]
American exceptionalism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): Kgarson (talk) 22:26, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured article because...of current events Kgarson (talk) 22:26, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose This was nominated by a newly registered user who has three edits at the time of my entry. They are unlikely to be familiar with the Featured Article Criteria, as demonstrated by the reason for nominating. The primary reason for submitting an article for this process should be because the nominator believes it meets the criteria. Paul MacDermott (talk) 23:39, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Important article but probably not yet even GA quality, let alone FA quality. Midnightblueowl (talk) 14:44, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Disagree with the comments above, having actually read the article, I believe that it can meet the requirements for FAC.
- Nominator: please resolve the {{citation required}} tags Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:33, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Not to mention a bunch of the current sources needs to be replaced, as their reliability is extremely doubtful just one random example I recommend withdraw and go to the regular review process Secret account 05:34, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I think this was a drive-by nomination. The nominator has made no further edits since 1 August, and the three they made all relate to this nomination. Paul MacDermott (talk) 13:10, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Not to mention a bunch of the current sources needs to be replaced, as their reliability is extremely doubtful just one random example I recommend withdraw and go to the regular review process Secret account 05:34, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator: please resolve the {{citation required}} tags Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:33, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FAC/ar, and leave the {{featured article candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Graham Colm (talk) 16:06, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.