I think that this article is in good shape to be a FA and I think its long enough, with enough information about the article. Plus if this becomes a FA I will be happy but if it isnt then I will try again another time.--Pookeo9 (talk) 13:17, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Comment - The article isn't bad, but it isn't ready for FA. The nominator hasn't made any recent contributions as far as I've seen. ₪Ceran →(cheer→chime →carol) 14:24, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
"starting every game from then until his retirement" - remove "from then"?
En dash should be hyphen in "three-time". Again in "eight-grader".
"He is of French and Choctaw ancestry; one of his paternal grandparents was a Native American affiliated with the Choctaw." The second clause repeats part of the first.
"Early life" - merge the paras.
Needs work. Tony(talk) 14:47, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Question - Have you asked the primary contributors if they think this is ready to come here, per the FAC instructions? Looking at the article, it does have more potential than most so-called "drive-by noms", but Tony is right, as usual. There are some issues with reference formatting and quality, among other things. It does have a good chance to be an FA in the future with some work, though. Giants2008 (17-14) 16:23, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Lead could do with more about his career and less of his stats. BUC
Refs #70 and #71 needs entering properly.
Also I can't see a FAC template on the talk page. (talk) 09:29, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Dabs; please check the disambiguation links identified in the toolbox. I added the missing fac tag. There are numerous MoS issues (see my edit summaries). SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:47, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Oppose - Three cite tags in the article is an automatic disqualifier for me. As for the reference issues I mentioned above, here's a list of them, though I don't claim to have caught everything.