Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Chromatophore

Chromatophore

I'd like to nominate this for a featured article, as i feel it meets the content requirement and is a fascinating subject that people ask about time and time again at the science reference desk. I guess it is a self nom, as i have provided most of the material over a period of many months, after setting myself a challenge to make a featured article from a stub. I have made efforts for peer review, and have had some excellent advice [1] [2] [3] from both scientists and copyeditors that i have tried to incorporate. I hope it has been enough, if not i'd appreciate your constructive criticism to reach my goal. Rockpocket 04:21, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Commment The 'and' here seems out of place and awkward: "containing and light reflecting" Rlevse 10:10, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, I believe. Anville 20:06, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes, I get it now; before I it made me think a word was missing or the and should not be there. Support now.Rlevse 13:33, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Nice job. Rlevse 13:33, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Fits FA criteria, nicely written article. — Wackymacs 17:21, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Jeronimo 17:48, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I couldn't resist doing a little copy editing, but that's just me. (-: Anville 20:06, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanks for the copyediting, much appreciated. Rockpocket 21:39, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support nicely well done Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 03:37, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support per all above. Anonymous _Anonymous 12:56, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Very well done and as readable as biochemistry and morphology can be (barring car chases and explosions, of course). Geogre 14:59, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note to Self: find a way to work car chases and explosions into my next FA nomination. Anville 16:13, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Nice read. Themillofkeytone 19:43, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Excellent article. —Coat of Arms (talk) 04:28, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Well done and interesting article. Anomaly1 01:43, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Very good work in this article.--P-Chan 02:50, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]