Wikipedia:Featured article review/Growth of the Old Swiss Confederacy/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed by User:Joelr31 01:59, 8 January 2009 [1].
Review commentary
[edit]- Notified Sj, WP Switzerland, Lupo
Almost total lack of inline citations & use of foreign langauage references(english ones are preferred on the english language wikipedia). ʄ!•¿talk? 08:55, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Lack of inline citations + prose: vague terms like "some". (WP:WEASEL words. --Redtigerxyz Talk 13:09, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Told User:Sj, Wikipedia:WikiProject Switzerland. --Redtigerxyz Talk 13:17, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Per the instructions at WP:FAR, please complete the notifications and post them back to here as in the sample at Wikipedia:Featured article review/Asthma/archive1. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:27, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Just to clarify, suggested FA criteria concerns are referencing (1c), including issues regarding WP:WEASEL and WP:NONENG. Concerns also regard consistent citations(2b), with almost all missing page numbers contrary to WP:CITE. ʄ!•¿talk? 14:44, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary
[edit]- Suggested FA criteria concern is citations. Joelito (talk) 16:43, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist per 1c. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) 05:44, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, agree with YellowMonkey (talk · contribs). Cirt (talk) 23:33, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.