I am nominating the 2000 Oscars for featured list because I believe it has great potential to become a Featured List. I read the requirements and criteria. I also followed how the 1929, 2009, 2010, 2012 Oscars were written. I am still making more updates and changes currently.Birdienest81 (talk) 16:01, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Support. Great job on prose and visual appeal! SoapFan12 02:13, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Support: Looks great, just add (|format=PDF) for ref. 35 – Underneath-it-All (talk) 21:25, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Nothing in the controvery section was actually a controversy, just incidents. Reywas92Talk 04:01, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Fixed: I integrated the sections mentioning the missing ballots and stolen Oscars into the Ceremony information. I believe they are still worth mentioning because they happened in the course of the production of the ceremony. As for the Whitney Houston debacle, I removed it because I felt it was more appropriate in the eponymous singer's article.
Support: Looks good to me. Excellent presentation, well done. --smarojitHD 02:47, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Support. I made two minor changes, but also I found the reference 40 has to be consistant with other LA Times refs. I found no other issues. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it!See terms and conditions. 23:56, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
References 33 and 34 were on the same page. However, they were pointing to two different facts that so happened to be on the same page. Nevertheless, I changed the references to avoid further confusion.