Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Asia Cup five-wicket hauls/archive1
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Crisco 1492 04:17, 17 January 2015 [1].
List of Asia Cup five-wicket hauls (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): —Vensatry (ping) 19:05, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Another fifers list based on List of Cricket World Cup five-wicket hauls, an existing FL, and List of ICC Champions Trophy five-wicket hauls, another candidate of mine which has gained substantial support. Look forward to your comments and suggestions. —Vensatry (ping) 19:05, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Seattle (talk) 17:57, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments:
I don't think your interpretation is correct. You use a subjective term (notable) that too with in quotes. If it were a fact your opinion would hold some weight. But in this case, it may not necessarily be a fact. Given that we have just one ref. to backup the claim, I feel an in-text attribution should come in place, else it's better that we revert to the original wording. —Vensatry (ping) 18:09, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
|
--Khadar Khani (talk) 23:56, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments—
|
- Support – meets the criteria! Waiting for you at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Pakistan women Test cricketers/archive1. --Khadar Khani (talk) 23:56, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comments –
No need to link the Indian cricket team twice in the lead."The former has takenGiants2008 (Talk) 03:18, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]tooktwo".- Someone has fixed both. Thanks for the review. :) —Vensatry (ping) 17:59, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. It meets the criteria. Nice work. --Carioca (talk) 21:46, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Harrias |
---|
;Comments from Harrias talk
Firstly, sorry it's taken me so long to have a look at this. As expected, it is generally very good, just a few minor issues:
Harrias talk 08:49, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support, thanks for your quick work. Nice list. Harrias talk 17:00, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:10, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.