Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of One Day International cricket matches played by Bangladesh and Ireland/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted by The Rambling Man 16:58, 2 April 2013 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of One Day International cricket matches played by Bangladesh and Ireland[edit]
List of One Day International cricket matches played by Bangladesh and Ireland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
This article is list of One-day international matches between Bangladesh and Ireland. It contains the 7 matches played between Bangladesh and Ireland. Also has references and it'll not have any edit war as this is not any scorecard. Pratyya (Hello!) 06:58, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose There is hardly any lead and I don't think it passes 3b criteria. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 12:59, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose, as User:Vibhijain, the lead is extremely short, and unrepresentative of the article as a whole. The tables are unreferenced throughout (although one does have external links) and none of them are sortable. The use of colour contravenes MOS:ACCESS. This, I am afraid to say, is another example of User:Pratyya Ghosh nominating an article for Good or Featured status when they fall far far below the required standard, something I have already mentioned to the user. Harrias talk 15:44, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Per Harrias and Vibhijain. As mentioned above, there is next to no lead and there are no references. I also wonder if perhaps the page title is a little long? Speedy fail with this one. Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 19:01, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose per reasons given above. —Vensatry (Ping me) 04:09, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose sorry Pratyya but the list is very unfit to be a featured list. Maybe next time. Mediran (t • c) 10:00, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been unsuccessful, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.