Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Autumn

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2015 at 07:01:33 (UTC)

Reason: Nice illustration of the season; large photo
Articles in which this image appears: Autumn
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena/Others
Creator: XRay, color balanced by Sting

Support as nominator – Pine^✉ 07:01, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
STRONG Support Oh thank god, someone else who remembers that we have month called November and a season known as autumn. The older I get the more it seems like these facts are lost on most of the rest of the world... TomStar81 (Talk) 07:34, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:49, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Pleasant tableau, decent comp, but detail at full res isn't great, and to my mind a sunny pic of 'golden autumn' would be a better representation of what the Germans call Herbststimmung. Sca (talk) 22:58, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Essentially per TomStar81, above. Good luck, — Cirt (talk) 01:46, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Jobas (talk) 14:09, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Sorry, but I agree with Sca. APK whisper in my ear 03:27, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per APK, Sca. Good pictures need good light, and this is perfectly legitimate. Authenticity is not obtained by seeking drab light. Samsara 19:37, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The lighting is typical for autumn, so I think the lighting is a benefit rather than a detraction for the encyclopedic value of this photo. --Pine^✉ 21:50, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2014 -- 3808 color balanced.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:36, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just curious Armbrust, I thought it had to be a 2/3rd consensus to pass? This isn't 2/3... It would need another support to be passed surely? Not trying to nit-pick or be fussy, just checking my understanding of the guidelines... gazhiley 12:19, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The nomination has 5 supports and 2 opposes, and that's makes a 71.4% for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:56, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Ah yes - it's my maths that is the issue... I divided the figures against each other, rather than against the total nominations - slight blonde moment there... Thank you for that Armbrust gazhiley 14:00, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]