Wikipedia:Naming conventions (television): Revision history

28 December 2006

• curprev 19:0919:09, 28 December 2006‎ Josiah Rowe talk contribs‎ 4,201 bytes −12‎ →‎Television programming: King of the Hill is at King of the Hill undo
• curprev 18:0518:05, 28 December 2006‎ Fred Bauder talk contribs‎ m 4,213 bytes −10‎ Restore table of contents undo

24 December 2006

• curprev 10:4410:44, 24 December 2006‎ Josiah Rowe talk contribs‎ 4,223 bytes +31‎ more shortcuts undo

14 December 2006

• curprev 04:0104:01, 14 December 2006‎ Ace Class Shadow talk contribs‎ 4,192 bytes −257‎ Revert. No consensus, no addition, period. undo
• curprev 03:5003:50, 14 December 2006‎ Elonka talk contribs‎ 4,449 bytes +257‎ How can we possibly be having a dispute about whether or not there is a dispute? undo

13 December 2006

• curprev 21:4721:47, 13 December 2006‎ Leflyman talk contribs‎ 4,192 bytes −209‎ -Arbcom notice; already noted at top of discussion page, where such notices are supposed to be undo
• curprev 21:2921:29, 13 December 2006‎ Elonka talk contribs‎ 4,401 bytes +209‎ Posting notice about ArbCom case undo
• curprev 18:0418:04, 13 December 2006‎ Minderbinder~enwiki talk contribs‎ 4,192 bytes −257‎ You're in the middle of an ArbCom case, and you're still engaging in disruptive behavior by unilaterally trying to declare a policy "in dispute"? No consensus for this. undo
• curprev 17:5717:57, 13 December 2006‎ Elonka talk contribs‎ 4,449 bytes +257‎ Re-adding dispute tag, based on the obvious fact that there is, in fact, a dispute undo
• curprev 16:1216:12, 13 December 2006‎ Minderbinder~enwiki talk contribs‎ 4,192 bytes −88‎ reverted "television" back to "TV" in disambiguations undo

12 December 2006

• curprev 00:3300:33, 12 December 2006‎ Ace Class Shadow talk contribs‎ 4,280 bytes −255‎ Revert. Taking tips from Matthew? The talk is against this addition. undo
• curprev 00:1600:16, 12 December 2006‎ Elonka talk contribs‎ 4,535 bytes +255‎ This is a compromise version of the tag. See talk. undo

11 December 2006

• curprev 23:2223:22, 11 December 2006‎ Ace Class Shadow talk contribs‎ 4,280 bytes −255‎ Revert. No consensus undo
• curprev 23:0423:04, 11 December 2006‎ Elonka talk contribs‎ 4,535 bytes +255‎ Posting disputed tag, since ArbCom case has been accepted undo

10 December 2006

• curprev 22:3322:33, 10 December 2006‎ Centrx talk contribs‎ m 4,280 bytes −14‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 22:3222:32, 10 December 2006‎ Centrx talk contribs‎ m 4,294 bytes 0‎ Unprotected Wikipedia:Naming conventions (television) undo

5 December 2006

• curprev 02:3602:36, 5 December 2006‎ Husond talk contribs‎ 4,294 bytes +14‎ protected undo
• curprev 02:3602:36, 5 December 2006‎ Husond talk contribs‎ m 4,280 bytes 0‎ Protected Wikipedia:Naming conventions (television): edit war, again [edit=sysop:move=sysop] undo
• curprev 01:4601:46, 5 December 2006‎ Wknight94 talk contribs‎ 4,280 bytes −19‎ rm disputed tag. The dispute claimants are nowhere near even having a "no consensus" vote on their proposed addendum undo
• curprev 01:3201:32, 5 December 2006‎ Centrx talk contribs‎ m 4,299 bytes +104‎ See Talk. More easily understand, professional naming for long-term, international project. undo
• curprev 01:2101:21, 5 December 2006‎ Elonka talk contribs‎ 4,195 bytes +19‎ There are 20-odd names at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Wikipedia:Naming conventions (television). There is clearly a dispute undo
• curprev 00:2900:29, 5 December 2006‎ Born2cycle talk contribs‎ 4,176 bytes −19‎ Rvt. Elonka, see Wikipedia:Policy dispute. There must be ''broad'' consensus to declare dispute. undo
• curprev 00:2300:23, 5 December 2006‎ Elonka talk contribs‎ 4,195 bytes +19‎ Having 5 people agreeing with each other for a couple hours, is not a consensus. Especially when most of the people here have already agreed to mediation, which indicates that there *is* a dispute. undo

4 December 2006

• curprev 21:4721:47, 4 December 2006‎ Ace Class Shadow talk contribs‎ 4,176 bytes −257‎ Consensus to add: 2 (really none.) Consensus to remove: 5. undo
• curprev 21:3521:35, 4 December 2006‎ Peregrine Fisher talk contribs‎ 4,433 bytes +257‎ rv dispute is ongoing undo
• curprev 21:2721:27, 4 December 2006‎ Ace Class Shadow talk contribs‎ m 4,176 bytes −257‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 21:2321:23, 4 December 2006‎ Matthew talk contribs‎ 4,433 bytes +257‎ This is not a vote; It is clearly disputed. undo
• curprev 21:1521:15, 4 December 2006‎ Wknight94 talk contribs‎ 4,176 bytes −257‎ rv. First the Wikipedia:Policy dispute page the tag points to is inactive. Second, the consensus is completely in the opposite direction, 5-2 so far in favor of there being no dispute. undo
• curprev 20:5720:57, 4 December 2006‎ Elonka talk contribs‎ 4,433 bytes +257‎ Restoring tag. The issue is proceeding to mediation, that's a pretty clear indicator that there's a dispute. undo
• curprev 20:0320:03, 4 December 2006‎ Ace Class Shadow talk contribs‎ 4,176 bytes −257‎ Removed tag per...oh fuck it. No consensus to add. undo

28 November 2006

• curprev 22:3322:33, 28 November 2006‎ Jay32183 talk contribs‎ 4,433 bytes −22‎ rv:adding the word "episode" to that part of the guideline makes the guidline no longer make sense undo
• curprev 22:2822:28, 28 November 2006‎ SilvaStorm talk contribs‎ m 4,455 bytes +22‎ →‎Episode articles: - episode undo

21 November 2006

• curprev 10:3610:36, 21 November 2006‎ Radiant! talk contribs‎ m 4,433 bytes 0‎ Unprotected Wikipedia:Naming conventions (television): Protected for long enough now. undo

18 November 2006

• curprev 08:3508:35, 18 November 2006‎ Radiant! talk contribs‎ m 4,433 bytes 0‎ Protected Wikipedia:Naming conventions (television): It is disputed whether this page is disputed. Kindly stop edit warring. [edit=sysop:move=sysop] undo
• curprev 03:5903:59, 18 November 2006‎ Ned Scott talk contribs‎ 4,433 bytes +238‎ if you want a dispute note, then lets make it accurate undo
• curprev 02:3002:30, 18 November 2006‎ Wknight94 talk contribs‎ 4,195 bytes +19‎ There have been ANOTHER 30 edits to the talk page today - the dispute is even carrying to whether there is a dispute - the existence of a dispute could not be more clear undo
• curprev 01:5301:53, 18 November 2006‎ Ned Scott talk contribs‎ 4,176 bytes −19‎ rv, no playing games undo
• curprev 01:5201:52, 18 November 2006‎ Elonka talk contribs‎ 4,195 bytes +19‎ Restoring tag. Wknight94 and I agree on this. There's clearly a dispute. undo
• curprev 00:3900:39, 18 November 2006‎ Ned Scott talk contribs‎ 4,176 bytes −19‎ they will always dispute it, they've made that clear, consensus is not 100%. undo

17 November 2006

• curprev 11:4211:42, 17 November 2006‎ Wknight94 talk contribs‎ 4,195 bytes +19‎ Leave the tag please, it's not hurting anything undo
• curprev 08:3808:38, 17 November 2006‎ Ace Class Shadow talk contribs‎ 4,176 bytes −19‎ You can't apply a tag without reasoning, period. undo
• curprev 08:3408:34, 17 November 2006‎ Matthew talk contribs‎ 4,195 bytes +19‎ It's disputed, you cant "un-dispute" it till the dispute is resolved, period. undo
• curprev 08:3208:32, 17 November 2006‎ Ace Class Shadow talk contribs‎ m 4,176 bytes −19‎ Revert. Give us valid reasoning. Vandals want to insert "pooop" in articles. Should we let them for no good reason? undo
• curprev 08:2108:21, 17 November 2006‎ Matthew talk contribs‎ 4,195 bytes +19‎ Disputed by more then 1 user. undo
• curprev 07:5607:56, 17 November 2006‎ Yaksha talk contribs‎ 4,176 bytes −19‎ remove tag. Misleading. Guildline not debated. Just one user contesting for "good faith exceptions" undo

16 November 2006

• curprev 20:1020:10, 16 November 2006‎ Elonka talk contribs‎ 4,195 bytes +19‎ Re-adding dispute tag. See talk for clear indication that there is, in fact, a dispute undo

9 November 2006

• curprev 07:0307:03, 9 November 2006‎ Josiah Rowe talk contribs‎ 4,176 bytes −18‎ →‎Episode articles: tweak, per Serge's good suggestion undo
• curprev 06:4206:42, 9 November 2006‎ Josiah Rowe talk contribs‎ 4,194 bytes −8‎ →‎Episode articles: "similar" is probably redundant undo
• curprev 06:4206:42, 9 November 2006‎ Josiah Rowe talk contribs‎ 4,202 bytes +30‎ →‎Episode articles: important qualifier: we don't need every eponymous episode to be disambiguated undo
• curprev 06:2706:27, 9 November 2006‎ TobyRush talk contribs‎ m 4,172 bytes +108‎ →‎Episode articles: tidied up the formatting a bit. undo