Wikipedia:Peer review/List of actors who have appeared in multiple Best Picture Academy Award winners/archive1
Appearance
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for December 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to nominate this list as a featured list candidate.
Thanks, TheLastAmigo (talk) 03:23, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Ruhrfisch comments: Very briefly, here are some suggestions for improvement.
- Biggest problem as I see it is a nearly complete lack of references. My rule of thumb is that every quote, every statistic, every extraordinary claim and every paragraph needs a ref. See WP:CITE and WP:V
- The one ref cited is used twice - use the <ref name = "blah">Ref goes here</ref> tag the first time, then just use <ref name = "blah"/> the next times.
- The one ref used appears to be from a blog - not sure this meets the criteria for reliable sources
- What if the name of the article was "List of people who have appeared in multiple Best Picture Academy Award winners" as the second list of producers, composers, etc. is not reflected in the title.
- Inclusion criteria are not specified - are all credited actors in a fiolm considered? What about someone like the key grip?
- Is there any way the films could be individually sortable - perhaps five colums in the actor list?
- Say "As of 2008" not currently
Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 20:15, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
- I see no reason to indent every films column with
         
. Reywas92Talk 17:02, 28 December 2008 (UTC)