Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 January 3
Appearance
January 3
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 04:57, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Only one link, and the template is not even in that article. ---Dough4872 03:37, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - Only two internal links do not really help navigation. Navboxes are for navigation, not a general display of information. Links can be replaced with a See Also section on the appropriate pages, Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 18:39, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
- Keep - Some users believe that a "See Also" section is not allowed under Wikipedia. Information included is not in the article.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonesdr77 (talk • contribs)
- Comment - I don't quite follow your logic there (and quite frankly, they are allowed). Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 14:52, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- Delete there are almost no links, all the entries are "blacklinks" (ie. not links, just text), and templates are not supposed to be boilerplate text. 76.66.197.17 (talk) 04:58, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Not enough working links to make a useful navbox. If there are editors who don't think "See also" sections are allowed, then point them to WP:ALSO or one of the WP:FA or WP:GA articles with such a section. --RL0919 (talk) 12:18, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 04:56, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned navigation template with only redlinks. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:11, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
- Delete - One working internal link. I'm not entirely sure whether the redlinks would meet the WP:GNG or WP:ATHLETE even if the articles did exist, Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 18:41, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Unused and seemingly abandoned, with no talk, no meaningful backlinks, no edits since it was created in July, and most important, no effort to create any of the linked articles that would make this a usable navbox. --RL0919 (talk) 12:21, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.