Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 December 18
December 18
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) sst✈·discuss· 07:24, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
WP:EXISTING -- The navbox is only used in the 2013 Conference season article, making it hard to navigate. The standard for this type of thing would be a standings template (e.g. Template:Standings Table Start), if there were season articles that existed. 🎄 Corkythehornetfan 🎄 15:27, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator's rationale: no season articles, navbox serves no navigational purpose. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 06:41, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:32, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
WP:EXISTING -- It is used in only two team articles and the 2014 Conference Tournament article. Also fails WP:NAVBOX No. 4: "There should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template". There is no season article and the standard is a standings template (e.g. Template:Standings Table Start). 🎄 Corkythehornetfan 🎄 15:23, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator's rationale: one linked season (and one linked main team article) does not justify this navbox. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 06:42, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was subst and delete. (non-admin closure) sst✈·discuss· 07:37, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
single use template, should be merged with the article and deleted. Frietjes (talk) 14:34, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:33, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
- Template:9X Shows (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Non notable shows and mostly the template is redundant as channel is off air. D'SuperHero (talk) 10:40, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- delete, better to use a category if any navigation at all. Frietjes (talk) 15:17, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).