Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 November 4

November 4

Template:Club Stats of Kaká

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 16:35, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

• Template:Club Stats of Kaká (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used in one place, Kaká, so no need for template- just subst it back into the article. See discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Article split? Is it needed?, consensus to delete (even template creator is fine with deletion) Joseph2302 (talk) 23:29, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 11:30, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, simply not needed as only used in one location. GiantSnowman 11:32, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 21:24, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2020 MNL Season statistics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 18:46, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

• Template:2020 MNL Season statistics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and duplicated per 2020 Myanmar National League statistics#Top scorers. Sawol (talk) 18:41, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

• Delete don't need a template for something that'll only be in one article. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:30, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 11:31, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, simply not needed as only used in one location. GiantSnowman 11:32, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Talk header italics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 16:34, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

• Template:Talk header italics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template, still in test phase from 2011 going by the /doc. Gonnym (talk) 12:59, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

• Delete unused and incomplete so not useful. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:44, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Developments in Sri Lanka

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 22:24, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

• Template:Developments in Sri Lanka (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This groups articles by a temporary characteristic, that they're under developed, and I don't think it's a good idea. Updating problems; looks like something off a news ticker. Geschichte (talk) 19:46, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 12:46, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

• Delete there is no specific inclusion criteria; a large number of redlinks; some links have already been developed; I just don't think there is a defined enough approach to what is included here to make it useful. --Tom (LT) (talk) 01:46, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Language/data/ISO 639-1/make

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the module's undeletion. Primefac (talk) 22:14, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

• Module:Language/data/ISO 639-1/make (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

As noted in the /doc of Module:Language/data/ISO 639-1, the list is now created with the Module:Language/data/iana languages/make module instead of this one. Gonnym (talk) 09:55, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).