Wikipedia:Articles for improvement/Nominations/Archives/2017/4

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Mechanically interlocked molecular architectures[edit]

Mechanically interlocked molecular architectures – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  • A relatively new area in the chemical sciences, these fascinating molecules have been considered for a plethora of applications. The chemistry behind the concept is relatively straight forward and should be accessible to anyone who studied chemistry at A level (or international equivalent). Material on the subject can be found readily online for free. EvilxFish (talk) 14:21, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - per nom--BabbaQ (talk) 09:58, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose Too technical for TAFI, also rated low importance by WP:Chemistry on the talk page – gwendy (talk) 13:33, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose as per Gwendy - Exciting for those who love chemical science - Not so much for those who know nothing about it, Out of the 177 members here I'd imagine as a rough guess only 2 to 3 would know about this topic so it would probably be sat for a week with nothing being improved on, In a nutshell as per Gwendy it's too technical here sorry, –Davey2010Talk 22:59, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days — MusikBot talk 04:35, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

John Cabot University[edit]

John Cabot University – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 65 daily hits

  • I would like to nominate this article for improvement since it provides very little information. Thank you for your consideration Axelkappa (talk) 07:47, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - per nom--BabbaQ (talk) 09:59, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose This isn't notable enough for TAFI – gwendy (talk) 13:31, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - Article needs improving and expanding so why not, IMHO I would say the Uni is notable. –Davey2010Talk 23:02, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days — MusikBot talk 04:35, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sikkimese cuisine[edit]

Sikkimese cuisine – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

– Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  1. Support per nom – gwendy (talk) 13:31, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support In the filed of local cuisine, every tradition is quite important.--Alexmar983 (talk) 10:33, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support per nom.  – Corinne (talk) 16:01, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. North America1000 16:44, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan–United Kingdom relations[edit]

Pakistan–United Kingdom relations – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - Average 28 daily hits

Has undergone recent work, but more can be added - Perhaps on cultural relations, for example. Good list of sources which would provide places to start in expanding content, and is listed as at least mid importance by two wikiprojects. --CSJJ104 (talk) 16:42, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 10:47, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support – Looks easily expandable per nom – gwendy (talk) 16:38, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days — MusikBot talk 04:35, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Revenge[edit]

Revenge – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

no Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days — MusikBot talk 04:35, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Crop[edit]

A bunch of domesticated plants

Crop – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 431 daily hits

  • High importance stub that could be worked on quite easily. Anarchyte (work | talk) 13:15, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support. North America1000 06:22, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support. Should be accessible to wide range of people EvilxFish (talk) 16:10, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support per nom – gwendy (talk) 17:24, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. North America1000 18:12, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shrimp and prawn as food[edit]

A simple shrimp dish

Shrimp and prawn as food – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  1. Support pretty decent page stats too! – gwendy (talk) 13:35, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

no Not approved (automated closure) No further input after 21 days — MusikBot talk 04:35, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do-rag[edit]

Do-rag – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  1. Support Has high page view stats --CSJJ104 (talk) 07:52, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - Definitely. It gets 563 hits per day.  – Corinne (talk) 03:40, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support 563 hits per day? I guess some are people from other languages too. I'll propose it for a crosswiki translation later.--Alexmar983 (talk) 07:49, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. North America1000 18:57, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Vegetable soup[edit]

A vegetable and noodle soup being cooked

Vegetable soup – (page view stats • edit • talk • history)

  1. Support Super expandable! – gwendy (talk) 17:22, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support it is always appropriate to focus a little bit more on these articles about very generic concepts.--Alexmar983 (talk) 08:18, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - per nom.  – Corinne (talk) 03:32, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. North America1000 18:57, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_improvement/Nominations/Archives/2017/4&oldid=1143717799"