Wikipedia:Unreferenced BLP Rescue/January 2010
Current Project - #25 - January 2010[edit]
|
Category:Unreferenced BLPs from January 2010
(Category does not exist or has been deleted due to completion of task.)
|
309 / 309 (100%)
|
- See also
- The list of articles, updated daily at about 05:30 UTC
- List of articles proposed to be deleted from this month's UBLP list, using the WP:CATSCAN tool.
- The starting list of 309 articles, useful for tracking progress using the related changes function.
- Random page from this month's effort
- Or choose from the lists of politicians, musicians, actors, writers, sportspeople or academics.
Progress by letter[edit]
A -
B -
C -
D -
E -
F -
G -
H -
I -
J -
K -
L -
M -
N -
O -
P -
Q -
R -
S -
T -
U -
V -
W -
X -
Y -
Z
- 302- And we're off again - Well Joe is off again already!The-Pope (talk)
- 247 - About time we had an update. The-Pope (talk) 16:27, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
- 200 - And we're back, again, under 4000 on the big red button. --joe deckertalk to me 22:33, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
- 178 - B and C are done. J04n(talk page) 14:14, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- 128 - Been randomly plugging away at whatever the largest letters are left, trying to leave more bite-sized letter chunks, I see folks have picked off Q, X Y and Z.... "I" has only one left! ;-) --joe deckertalk to me 17:41, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
- 98 Under the ton. The-Pope (talk) 17:15, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- 77 - And I finally found a beauty pageant contestent where the pageant organization had a useful ref. Go figure! --joe deckertalk to me 00:53, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
- 64-22 = 42 left --joe deckertalk to me 14:58, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
- 32-23 = 9 left anyone think there is NO Possible way we could clear out Jan and May before the anniversary of this project tomorrow? The-Pope (talk) 12:29, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- This project has been far more successful than I could have ever imagined, everyone involved big or small has a reason to be proud!--Milowent • talkblp-r 12:43, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- I must admit that I thought the "by topic" approach that I pushed at WP:URBLP would be the solution, but it's only worked in certain topics - this project's approach of "by month" has been the only real solution to the problem. You created this page at 20:50, 1 July 2010 UTC... so we have under 8 hours to do 6 here and 50-7 from May 2010, to clear out EVERY single UBLP that was tagged when this project was started except for the ones from June 2010 and definitely every UBLP that existed when the whole WP:BLPRFC issue happened! Outstanding work by all, regardless of whether we hit this mini-target or not. The-Pope (talk) 13:35, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- Indeed, congrats to everyone! I can't imagine, today, how big a pile 60,000 articles must have seemed at the time, a mere 3710 left seems like a dainty walk in the park by comparison. I picked off the penultimate January (Vir Singh remains) and ten from May, perhaps that will get us a bit closer! --joe deckertalk to me 15:20, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- I must admit that I thought the "by topic" approach that I pushed at WP:URBLP would be the solution, but it's only worked in certain topics - this project's approach of "by month" has been the only real solution to the problem. You created this page at 20:50, 1 July 2010 UTC... so we have under 8 hours to do 6 here and 50-7 from May 2010, to clear out EVERY single UBLP that was tagged when this project was started except for the ones from June 2010 and definitely every UBLP that existed when the whole WP:BLPRFC issue happened! Outstanding work by all, regardless of whether we hit this mini-target or not. The-Pope (talk) 13:35, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- This project has been far more successful than I could have ever imagined, everyone involved big or small has a reason to be proud!--Milowent • talkblp-r 12:43, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- Hooooray!!!! --joe deckertalk to me 17:38, 1 July 2011 (UTC)