Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2013 June 21
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < June 20 | << May | June | Jul >> | Current help desk > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
June 21[edit]
Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Monsanto Technology LLC v Cefetra BV and Others[edit]
I would like some help with the creation of an article: Articles for creation/Monsanto Technology LLC v Cefetra BV and Others, it was declined due to my use of external links. I realize that the method I used is not ideal, but many of the existing Wikipedia articles I used for comparison are referenced in the same way. I did not find WP:REFB particularly helpful. If someone can provide me with a little more direction I would greatly appreciate it.
Thanks, Mike MayorMike1966 (talk) 02:24, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- I have fixed the references in the lead section - take a look at what I did and do the same in the rest of the article. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:07, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi - I have improved on the sources. Please check if it is ok. And any more suggestions before this article can be accepted? Thank you.
99.27.180.111 (talk) 03:00, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Moving a new article from 'Articles for Creation' to geting it reviewed[edit]
The wikipedia page in question is Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/TheGenealogist
I put this article together last week but despite hitting the save page button, it seems stuck in the 'Articles for creation' category and says it has not been submitted for review. Apologies I'm quite new to this and wondered if you could advise what I need to do please to get the article submitted for review? many thanks, David Osborne Wgc120 (talk) 08:51, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- You can add {{subst:submit}} at the top of your article, and it will be submitted. However, I happen to have heard of TheGenealogist anyway as a close relative of mine is a regular exhibitor at Who Do You Think You Are Live?, and anything that cites multiple issues of Who Do You Think You Are and Your Family Tree is notable so I'm passing the article right now. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:31, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- Wgc120, for goodness sake! Count yourself lucky that it got reviewed as quickly as it did. You will now find it at TheGenealogist. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:47, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Article rejected[edit]
Thanks for telling the reason why the article was rejected and would love to be helped in publishing it. Silvia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erasmus Solutions in Cooperation (talk • contribs) 15:10, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- Your article does not reference any reliable sources such as major news, book or magazine reports. You need to reference these in order for your article to pass. See Referencing for Beginners for a guide on how to do this. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:29, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Please help me fix this to your standards. My uncle was a marvelous man and he deserves this. Thank you.
Lori Hansen132.3.57.81 (talk) 20:38, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- Try reading WP:REFB on how to format your references. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:01, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
dont you have any one that i can talk to on the phone in person i dont understand a lot of this — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brian lanids (talk • contribs) 21:20, 21 June 2013 (UTC)