Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 October 31
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < October 30 | << Sep | October | Nov >> | November 1 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
October 31
[edit]
Hello, I have been working on draft:constantine mavroudis, and I have submitted it a few times and it had been sent back for editing. It is my first submission and I am learning a lot. It appears with the last submission it has been deleted. I would like to have it back as I am not done trying just yet. Each submission I have had great feedback to learn from, I really believe this to be a worthy submission, I just need to edit more. Please help!!!
Amr247rn (talk) 04:09, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
- I'm not familer with the page but "18 September 2018 User:Nyttend deleted page Draft:Constantine Mavroudis (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion)" so someone and an Admin found it to be overly promotional. Legacypac (talk) 04:23, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
- Part of the deleted page said Constantine Mavroudis, M.D. (born July 19, 1946) is a Greek-born American Congenital Heart Surgeon who has notable contribution to the field of congenital heart disease through research, publications, international speaking engagements and professional collaboration amongst cardiothoracic surgeons’ organizations. Noteworthy contributions in way of surgical technique include the redo-Fontan, pulmonary valve-sparing tetralogy of Fallot repairs, anomalous aortic origin of coronary artery repair, coronary bypass in infants and children, arrhythmia cryoablation surgery and assisted in initiation of neonates with hypoplastic left heart syndrome for transplant. Dr. Mavroudis has contributed research articles, book chapters and text books including Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, 3rd & 4th edition, and recent publication of the Atlas of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, 1st edition. Mavroudis's work has been cited more than 16000 times, over 6000 times since 2013. The Mavroudis-Urschel Award established in 2006 is awarded annually to an STSA member who, in addition to important scientific contributions, encompasses "social spirit, camaraderie and fun for which STSA is famous". He was voted amongst Orlando's best Doctors in 2013 and the Finest Doctors in 2014 under the Pediatric Cardiac Surgery category by Best Doctors, Inc. If you consult biographies in Britannica or World Book, you'll see that they write in a significantly different style. Please use reliable secondary sources (books, academic journals, etc.) instead of primary sources (news reports, in particular) when writing articles, as these will help you see what's been deemed significant in the long run and thus what belongs in an encyclopedia article about him. Nyttend (talk) 04:47, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
- that is a very high number of cites making him notable. Legacypac (talk) 05:17, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
10:10:59, 31 October 2018 review of submission by All bikram
[edit]- Username missing!
- No draft specified!
All bikram (talk) 10:10, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
- To start a new article see the Wikipedia:Article wizard. If you need help editing then check out the Wikipedia:Tutorial. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 10:37, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
11:37:59, 31 October 2018 review of draft by 14.143.42.152
[edit]
14.143.42.152 (talk) 11:37, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
- Please do not shout ―Abelmoschus Esculentus 11:39, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
- II0IVII is wrong, it should be something like MMVII because 2000 is MM not II0I. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 12:45, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
- This isn't WP:ANI, which is good for the OP, because if this were, I would recommend a competence block. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:37, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
14:52:03, 31 October 2018 review of draft by Mvscrimenti
[edit]- Mvscrimenti (talk · contribs)
Hi, I am just wondering why the article, Draft:Ucommune, I submitted over a month ago has not been reviewed yet. If it's just stuck in the backlog, that's fine. But if there is a particular problem, I'd be happy to fix it. I have made considerable improvements since its initial rejection, but I'm curious if the large notice saying that it had been rejected at the top of the page has deterred editors from reviewing it. Thanks in advance for any help.
Mvscrimenti (talk) 14:52, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
- I think the less than complimentary comment from a previous reviewer about the references didn't help much. I have approved it now to Ucommune. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 15:12, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
21:25:14, 31 October 2018 review of submission by Faith Trail
[edit]- Faith Trail (talk · contribs)
Hi, I'm wondering why my text was deleted. Don't worry, I will know to never use Wikipedia again.