Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 April 30

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< April 29 << Mar | April | May >> May 1 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


April 30

[edit]

09:02:26, 30 April 2019 review of submission by Morgangr

[edit]


I don't believe that someone can diminish our work and reject our article in such a manner and comment. This is unacceptable and degrading. The fact that our charity is not well known does not mean that we cannot list it on Wikipedia or ANY other online list of organisations, events etc. Our charity is 100% voluntary and 100% grass roots. We help people that governments and large charities don't.

Thanks Andreas Papazidis Co-Founder and Trustee GRACEaid.org.uk

Morgangr (talk) 09:02, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Morgangr. The rejection of the draft is not a reflection on the quality of the organization or the worth of what they do. Many good organizations are not suitable for inclusion. Wikipedia is not a list of organizations, it is an encyclopedia. It aims to cover only those topics that are notable, ones that have gained significant attention from the world at large and over a period of time, as evidenced by significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable, secondary sources. Being "not well known" means there should not be an article on the topic here. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:53, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 09:08:35, 30 April 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Anand raj singh Sisodia

[edit]


My draft have own reference and contain specialist please check and success my work

Anand raj singh Sisodia (talk) 09:08, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anand raj singh Sisodia It would help very much if you could add some more informationand sources. This is a town, and we do include all tows if they are adequately documented. Peraps some regional magazines or newspapers have articles about it? They don't necessarily have to be in English . DGG ( talk ) 17:35, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:48:58, 30 April 2019 review of draft by Fatemiounwiki1

[edit]


Fatemiounwiki1 (talk) 09:48, 30 April 2019 (UTC) may i ask to helm me how can i publish my article[reply]

Hi Fatemiounwiki1. Four sections of the draft: birth, life, education, and scientific trips, cite no sources. Also, the nature of the second reference is unclear. Is it a book, an academic journal, a magazine, or what? Who is the author, what organization published it, and when was it published? It is not clear from the two sources cited, one of which is not independent of Shams al-Din Mohammad Mojtahedi Najafi, whether he is notable (suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia). You may wish to consider alternative outlets for your work. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:06, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

10:55:10, 30 April 2019 review of submission by Jacqueline456

[edit]


Someone has created this profile may he/she doesn't have the much more details so I have updated an account of a young entrepreneur and If I'm not wrong, this will be goes for live. Jacqueline456 (talk) 10:55, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 14:38, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

11:59:24, 30 April 2019 review of submission by Karan raghavan

[edit]


i want to know why my article got rejected.i used good references too. Karan raghavan (talk) 11:59, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia and YouTube and Instagram are not reliable sources. Theroadislong (talk) 15:33, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:52:57, 30 April 2019 review of draft by Warriorwolfraven

[edit]


Warriorwolfraven (talk) 15:52, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How do I add photos/images to my article?

Hi Warriorwolfraven. Unless you took the photos yourself, start with Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. To further understand what the copyright holder has to give up, you may find it useful to read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you can't get permission, you can't use the image. Once you have the correct permission, adding an image is a two-step process: upload it, then use it in on a page.
Go to Commons:First steps and carefully step through the tutorial. When you get to "First steps/Uploading files", don't dive in too hastily. First follow the link on that page to learn about the different licensing options. Other useful advance reading includes Wikipedia:File names and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images, which will prepare you to answer important questions the upload wizard will ask you. If after that you have any questions or doubts, Commons has its own help desk.
Once you've uploaded an image, the picture tutorial explains how to use it on a page. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:07, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

19:03:23, 30 April 2019 review of draft by Juleskramer

[edit]


Hello, I would like to update the title of my article to Miami-Dade County Commission for Women. So, just adding the hyphen. I also would like upload a logo but I am getting an error about owning the image. Is there any way to avoid this?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Miami_Dade_County_Commission_for_Women

Juleskramer (talk) 19:03, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Juleskramer The fair use provision of copyright does not apply to drafts, so don't try to add a logo now. The presence or absence of images will have no effect on whether the draft is accepted. If it is accepted, then you can add a logo. --Worldbruce (talk) 21:35, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

19:31:15, 30 April 2019 review of draft by Dora's ice lolly

[edit]


Direct link to Draft

Hello, I have written to you before but I wonder if my message got lost. Please see links below, I do not understand why you are allowing Wiki articles about other rabbit organisations but not Cottontails. If you compare my article to the others in the link, I don't see why theirs is acceptable and mine is not. Please compare and review your decision. Thank you for your assistance.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_Rabbit_Society https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Rabbit_Council Dora's ice lolly (talk) 19:31, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dora's ice lolly. Your previous question was answered on 30 December, here.
Wikipedia is forever a work in progress. It contains high quality articles and poor quality articles. The existence of an article does not mean it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. British Rabbit Council, for example, is tagged for notability, which is often the first step on the road to deletion. So generally it isn't productive to compare a draft to other pages. The essay WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS may help you understand why. If you wish to learn from example articles, be sure to use only Wikipedia's best.
If you believe that you have improved Draft:Cottontails to the point that it meets the oganization notability criteria, then you may submit it for review by clicking the blue button in the big gray box on the draft. --Worldbruce (talk) 21:32, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

22:14:15, 30 April 2019 review of submission by ICrimea

[edit]


ICrimea (talk) 22:14, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


22:14:15, 30 April 2019 review of submission by ICrimea


On English language few sources. --ICrimea (talk) 22:14, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

23:25:14, 30 April 2019 review of submission by Marcela McLeod

[edit]

I would like to ask for help fellow editors to see why is my article being declined. TMarcela McLeod (talk) 23:25, 30 April 2019 (UTC)he reason stated on the review is the inline citation aren't used. As I am aware I've included all the supporting citations for the article and not sure which information is the editor refering to.[reply]

Please let me know which line exactly I need to fix as this process of creating article is being very exhausting and long.

Thank you.

Marcela McLeod (talk) 23:25, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Marcela McLeod. I assume you're writing about Draft:Todd Hiscock. In response to the review, you've already removed masses of unsupported information, but there are still statements that do not cite a source. You write, "this process of creating article is being very exhausting and long." Yes, it is. Creating a new article is one of the most difficult, time consuming, and frustrating things a novice Wikipedian can attempt. Reviewers may send you hither and yon to fix various problems, but no matter how much editing you do, Todd Hiscock and Draft:Essential Coffee are not notable. So there is no chance of either draft being accepted for publication.
You could reexamine the topics in a couple years. By then they may have been covered in depth by sources that demonstrate notability (think scholarly books, The Australian Financial Review, The New Zealand Herald, and the like). You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 04:48, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2019_April_30&oldid=895854466"