Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 July 10

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< July 9 << Jun | July | Aug >> July 11 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


July 10

[edit]

03:34:09, 10 July 2021 review of submission by 117.212.19.89

[edit]

Is article right because many people are searching for that company information about that I write article of the company in detail there are many people daily searching for that company detail I take interview founder and we'll all the detail in that 117.212.19.89 (talk) 03:34, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

03:58:15, 10 July 2021 review of draft by Justiyaya

[edit]


Hi, my Draft:Empower Work have been rejected due to GNG reasons, but I think I have enough sources to meet GNG.

Sources:

https://qz.com/work/1419478/empower-work-lets-anxious-employees-text-counselors-for-free/ Quartz

https://www.fastcompany.com/40499797/can-these-apps-help-you-when-your-hr-department-fails Fast Company

https://techcrunch.com/2018/02/10/hr-has-lost-the-trust-of-employees-here-is-who-has-it-now/ Tech Crunch

https://www.chicagotribune.com/business/careers-finance/sns-volunteering-can-help-gain-skills-and-land-job-20200225-jh27f7zxtrewlm5j3sr67xq2nu-story.html Chicago Tribune

Analysis,

Quartz: Mentioned founder's name 8 times mentioned organization name 6 times, basically the whole article is about it

Fast Company: Founder's name 2 times, organization name 3 times Whole article is basically about it, provides a criticism section (I should include that in the article)

Tech Crunch: 6 mentions for organization name, 8 mentions for founder name, section written about it (not the whole article) about 1/4-1/3

Chicago Tribune (newly added): 3 mentions for founder's name and another 3 for organization name. Article is basically interviews with NGOs and people who volunteered there, about half of the article covers the organization.

I have sent what is basically the exact message to my first reviewer, they basically told me to resubmit, my second reviewer seems to be ignoring their talk page.

Do you think my draft meets GNG, and if you do think so, what other improvements can I make, and what should I do next?

Justiyaya 03:58, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

04:13:48, 10 July 2021 review of submission by 2603:8080:1E03:BC1F:C20:DE7A:3F3C:4994

[edit]

??? 2603:8080:1E03:BC1F:C20:DE7A:3F3C:4994 (talk) 04:13, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(comment by non reviewer) Hi anon, the draft was denied due to the subject not being notable enough. A subject needs to have at least two reliable sources independent of the subject providing significant coverage in order to be notable enough, your sources are all basically the subject being credited as a producer, and I don't think that counts as significant coverage. Furthermore, there are many sections that are not supported by any citations, which seems like a violation of our biographies of living persons policy, which states "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by an inline citation to a reliable, published source".
(To anyone that answers this page): I would like to apologize for answering questions here without your permission, but I'm quite confident that my answer is correct, and you seem to have quite a long backlog, so I'm going to answer some for you. If you don't like the answers I'm giving, please leave a message on my talk page asking me to stop, thanks! Justiyaya 05:54, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think anyone is going to complain about your answers so long as they're accurate and you're genuinely attempting to help. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 16:00, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

05:05:03, 10 July 2021 review of submission by Helpo786

[edit]


Helpo786 (talk) 05:05, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Courtesy link: User:Helpo786/sandbox/Azaman Anwer Justiyaya 05:41, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Helpo786: I assume this is about User:Helpo786/sandbox/Azaman Anwer. If so, User:Helpo786/sandbox/Azaman Anwer is in no way ready for mainspace, as it does not contain any content about this subject. If you merely want to request that an article about Azman Anwer be created, please use WP:Requested articles for that, even if it is highely backlogged. Here at AfC we unfortunally can only deal with drafts that are at least a valid Stub. Victor Schmidt (talk) 06:09, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

06:06:28, 10 July 2021 review of submission by Thisissujanrai

[edit]


Thisissujanrai (talk) 06:06, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thisissujanrai, not all subjects can have an article on Wikipedia, your article doesn't meet WP:GNG, which basically says that an article must have at least two reliable, independent sources that provide significant coverage to the subject. Justiyaya 06:22, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

07:45:02, 10 July 2021 review of submission by 175.145.98.33

[edit]


175.145.98.33 (talk) 07:45, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


07:45:02, 10 July 2021 review of draft by 175.145.98.33

[edit]

Request on 08:48:01, 10 July 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by YNovakovic

[edit]


Dear Wikipedia,

My article draft Afripedia keeps getting rejected on the grounds that I should merge it with an already existing article with a similar name: Afripedia Project. I keep explaining that it is not the same topics, but nothing seems to help.

This is my draft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Afripedia

And this is the page of the suggested merge:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afripedia_Project

Please advise.

Kind regards,

User YNovakovic


YNovakovic (talk) 08:48, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

10:21:11, 10 July 2021 review of submission by Magiic Damez

[edit]

It says it was rejected but I did not violate anything. Please publish this lost information. Magiic Damez (talk) 10:21, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Magiic Damez. In the references section you wrote "≤Journals found in an abandoned town≥". That is insufficient bibliographic information to make the content verifiable. See Wikipedia:Citing sources and Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for more information about how to correctly identify where you got your information. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:30, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

10:24:05, 10 July 2021 review of submission by 1.38.197.113

[edit]


1.38.197.113 (talk) 10:24, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It says it was rejected but I did not violate anything. Please publish this lost information. 1.38.197.113 (talk) 10:24, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that this person does not meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable actress. As such, the draft was rejected and will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 11:13, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

11:15:47, 10 July 2021 review of draft by 103.132.240.240

[edit]


103.132.240.240 (talk) 11:15, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You don't ask a question. 331dot (talk) 11:16, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

nilesh jetpariya please anyone help me with this wikipedia page . i don't know anything about wikipedia rules— Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.132.240.240 (talk)
Please do not constantly create new sections; please edit this existing section. You may wish to learn more about Wikipedia before attempting to create a new article- creating a new article is the hardest thing to do on Wikipedia, and doing it withoug any knowledge usually leads to frustration and other bad feelings. Please read Your First Article for starters. 331dot (talk) 11:22, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

12:08:32, 10 July 2021 review of submission by ClaireBearybear

[edit]


I meant what I said and I said what I meant. Simple it’s not, I am afraid you will find, for a mind-maker-upper to make up his mind. But you’ll miss the best things if you keep your eyes shut. The more that you read, The more things you will know. The more that you learn, The more places you’ll go.

Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. It’s not.

ClaireBearybear (talk) 12:08, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I know you think you're clever of wit
But your article's naught but a pile of s(Redacted)
The reviewer took a look, and sent it away
"Another Seigenthaler? Not this day!" —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 15:18, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As an addendum to the note above
I've given the draft a much-needed shove
It's either garbage or a mocking praise
I rather doubt it shall last two more days. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 15:36, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

12:08:45, 10 July 2021 review of submission by Ourbag

[edit]

Additional citations has been added for the director in question. I have also added a reference from an OTT platform where the movie '12 seconds' is added to establish presence. This is in adherence to the 5 pillars of Wikipedia Requesting you to kindly approve the document as there has been a research on the movie director's work.

I have added the watch page as permanent so as to add citations for the director as and when there is a press release or his work is highlighted. Also, all the citations added herewith are from leading regional dailies having more than 15 million circulation in print and digital.

Kindly consider the same for approval as my first job, it will motivate me to contribute better articles.

Ourbag (talk) 12:08, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ourbag The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 14:17, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

12:37:47, 10 July 2021 review of submission by ReMü77

[edit]

Draft:Paul van Son }} Hi, has my article Draft:Paul van Son somehow arrived here in this queue? So that it will be discussed and I will be able to take part in the discussion? Because I haven't discovered it yet... never been here before ;-) Thanks in advance! ReMü77 (talk) 12:37, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, still have to find my way in this area--ReMü77 (talk) 12:43, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This isn't a queue, and in fact there isn't a formal review queue. Reviewers are volunteers, like everyone else on Wikipedia, and will get to a draft when they can. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 15:15, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since the article has been "flagged" I already added several good sources. I will see what else there is...--ReMü77 (talk) 15:58, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

12:39:07, 10 July 2021 review of submission by 175.145.98.33

[edit]


175.145.98.33 (talk) 12:39, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. No sources, no article, no debate. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 15:13, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14:47:01, 10 July 2021 review of submission by Sahiba21

[edit]


Sahiba21 (talk) 14:47, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Courtesy link: Draft:Hasmeet Kaur
This draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. We're not a social network, and we have no tolerance for unsourced autobiographies. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 15:12, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

15:06:39, 10 July 2021 review of submission by Kimran999

[edit]


Kimran999 (talk) 15:06, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. The two sources I was able to assess are both useless for notability - one is presumably an interview with the subject, the other a gossip article written under a role byline. Even if the two remaining sources were impeccable it likely would not be enough to justify an article. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 15:10, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 18:20:39, 10 July 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by A.kingstar

[edit]


Greetings, regarding to my article which was decline today, I would like to know if Wikipedia can assist me on how to write the article to Wikipedia standard. I will appreciate in hearing from you. A.kingstar (talk) 18:20, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A.kingstar (talk) 18:20, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


18:24:31, 10 July 2021 review of submission by A.kingstar

[edit]
Am by name Azuogu Kingsley John I wrote an article regarding myself on how I started my school and to my present state but unfortunately it was decline due to Wikipedia standard of article and I write to Wiki on how to assist me to get through the standard of your article.

A.kingstar (talk) 18:24, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Courtesy link: Draft:Azuogu Kingsley John
This draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. We do not accept resumes or biographies of living people without any sort of reliable sources cited. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 21:14, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2021_July_10&oldid=1033811999"