Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 October 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< October 1 << Sep | October | Nov >> October 3 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


October 2[edit]

02:41:39, 2 October 2021 review of draft by NruasPaoYPP[edit]


Hello,

Would you like to help me please? My question is about my draft "Ban Phou pheung noi". It has been denied twice. The problem is because there were some YouTube video references cited there and they needed to fix the time and date of the videos. There was another thing too, and it was about the topic of my article. Is it the mountain "Phou pheung" or the village of "ban Phou pheung noi"?

Actually, the two issues are fixed. All YouTube videos have been removed from my article. An the topic of article is about the village "Ban Phou pheung noi", it's not the mountain which is "Phou pheung".

Would you like to help me and check the paragraphs of my article if they make sense to readers? Do you see any video references cited there need to remove from my article? What should I need to change or remove?

Thank you.


NruasPaoYPP (talk) 02:41, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs a rewrite for grammar and clarity. The first few paragraphs are confusing: The article is supposed to be about a village but the introduction to the draft seems to be describing a nearby mountain and some geography that is not specific to the village. Salimfadhley (talk) 00:16, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

04:05:39, 2 October 2021 review of draft by Annammedias[edit]


I'm new to Wikipedia. I created a page yesterday.

Submission has been declined. I have given adequate links for verification. And our film is on 9th place out of 30 movies (Times of india)

Can you please let me know why submission is declined?

Annam Medias (talk) 04:05, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Annammedias The reviewer left a reason at the top of the draft; the draft is not adequately supported by independent reliable sources. 331dot (talk) 07:03, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

05:43:05, 2 October 2021 review of draft by Akkanadan j g jayakrishna menon gurukkal[edit]


the wikipedia i created is showing that it is declined by theroadislong i need help to rectify it and to pulish my page as it is genuine and there is no false submission how can i create this page without any mistake and publish it please provide necessary guidence Akkanadan j g jayakrishna menon gurukkal (talk) 05:43, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Akkanadan j g jayakrishna menon gurukkal Wikipedia is not for telling the world about yourself, please see the autobiography policy. Your draft was also completely unsourced, which is unacceptable for any biography, see the biographies of living persons policy. Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a person, showing how they meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person. We are interested in what others say about you, not what you want to say about yourself. If you just want to tell the world about yourself, you should use social media or a personal website. 331dot (talk) 07:01, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

10:09:35, 2 October 2021 review of draft by Marvelcanon1[edit]


I need help on finding out what mistakes i have done and what i should do to make this article accapted or reliable.

Marvelcanon1 (talk) 10:09, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the sources on this draft are inappropriate. We cannot cite self-published sources such as StackExchange. All our sources need to be reliable secondary sources. Salimfadhley (talk) 00:19, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 11:49:00, 2 October 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by TobiOdeyemi[edit]


Kylie tastic rejected my post even though it has ORIGINAL Reasearch.

TobiOdeyemi (talk) 11:49, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You realise that Original research is not permitted here? Victor Schmidt (talk) 12:48, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14:30:05, 2 October 2021 review of submission by 171.76.228.43[edit]


171.76.228.43 (talk) 14:30, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The only source this nearly content-less and poorly-spelt article has is to the subject's own website. Notability has not been met. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 15:53, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14:32:26, 2 October 2021 review of submission by SebastianMendoza34[edit]


SebastianMendoza34 (talk) 14:32, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SebastianMendoza34 Your draft has no content? Theroadislong (talk) 15:54, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@SebastianMendoza34: This has never had any content on it other than submission and decline templates. There's no point submitting a blank page for review. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 15:55, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

19:42:59, 2 October 2021 review of submission by Imadnanhossain[edit]


Imadnanhossain (talk) 19:42, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have recreated this badly written, self-serving promotional autobiography so many times that it has been blocked from further recreation here. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:53, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]