Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 March 4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< March 3 << Feb | March | Apr >> March 5 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


March 4[edit]

00:11:06, 4 March 2022 review of submission by 73.61.15.86[edit]

i am making this page for a friend and everything i say in it is a joke so like can I keep it up for him to be able to see it please 73.61.15.86 (talk) 00:11, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely not. Find somewhere else. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 00:21, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

11:20:28, 4 March 2022 review of submission by 123.208.83.210[edit]


123.208.83.210 (talk) 11:20, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Hi please check these articles shouldn’t this merit him a article?

Both sources are primary, repeating only what he says about himself. (One of the two sources had been added twice, but the duplicate has been removed). He makes quite a positive impression in terms of what he wants to achieve and why, less so in his provably false claims of being the first reality star in Afghanistan. That does not change the fundamental issue though: until there are sources showing that he meets at least these criteria, there can't be an article about him. --bonadea contributions talk 11:39, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Fair enough boss 11:43, 4 March 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.208.83.210 (talk)

Request on 11:42:24, 4 March 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Jirayeni[edit]


Hi, I am start to contributing Wikipedia and my first article about a film producer which her data is available on imdb.com but my referenced data was declined. How can I improve my article to pass review?

Jirayeni (talk) 11:42, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jirayeni: IMDb is not an acceptable source what-so-ever, and nor are her own website or Iran government websites. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 20:50, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

11:46:39, 4 March 2022 review of submission by Maximivanchuk[edit]



Maxim Ivanchuk Is an Ukraine plastic surgeon who is been called "The Father of Microsurgery" for his contributions in the history and development of reconstructive microsurgical procedures.[1] He is a past president of the Ukraine Society for Surgery of the Hand, the International Society of Reconstructive Microsurgery, and the Ukraine Association of Plastic Surgery.He served as a clinical professor of surgery at both Stanford University and the University of California - San Francisco.

References

  1. ^ Article in International Business Times Retrieved 24 February 2022


Maximivanchuk (talk) 11:46, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Maximivanchuk: This draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. One source cannot support an entire artiole of any length, let alone a biography of a living/recently-departed person which requires a strong source for every claim that could be challenged. What is your connexion to Ivanchuk?Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 20:48, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

17:04:27, 4 March 2022 review of draft by Emmy1707[edit]


Hello, I have changed the writing style of the article and some sources and would like to know if it is correct now. Thank you very much for feedback.Emmy1707 (talk) 17:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC) Emmy1707 (talk) 17:04, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Emmy1707. You will find out if it is correct when the draft is next reviewed, probably within the next 3 months or so. This page is for questions about the Articles for creation process. It is not a shortcut through the pool of submissions awaiting review. Do not post here every time you make a change and want a review. The other 3,000 waiting editors also want their submissions reviewed. Be patient. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:31, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK, then I will wait patiently. I thought because of the last feedback, I could ask again. Thanks anyway.Emmy1707 (talk) 13:23, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

20:14:16, 4 March 2022 review of submission by DrobertiACDCSGomez2022[edit]


DrobertiACDCSGomez2022 (talk) 20:14, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DrobertiACDCSGomez2022 You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. It is completely unsourced; a Wikipedia article must summarize what independent reliable sources say. 331dot (talk) 20:23, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

22:17:09, 4 March 2022 review of draft by Spiel[edit]


Spiel (talk) 22:17, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This organization has annual awards of some renown. I made the page initially because of the awards, but also because it is a unique group in New Zealand that supports writers and readers.

Please tell me what else you would like to see here.

Spiel, you seem to be relying mostly on the subject's own words. You need to find independent reliable sources that discuss the subject.Slywriter (talk) 22:23, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]