Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2024 March 11

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< March 10 << Feb | March | Apr >> March 12 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


March 11

[edit]

05:01, 11 March 2024 review of submission by ASR.killadi.da

[edit]

Please approve this article because it is updated to my best of knowledge. ASR.killadi.da (talk) 05:01, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft has not been submitted for review, but it will be declined because it is unsourced with no evidence of notability. Theroadislong (talk) 08:55, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

06:02, 11 March 2024 review of submission by BrizAlmighty

[edit]

Not understanding why the reliability of the magazines cited is questionable. BrizAlmighty (talk) 06:02, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

13:30, 11 March 2024 review of submission by Vastelian-Chairman

[edit]

My page was declined with no reason My Wikipedia page for Vastelland was declined. I do not know why, it said that it had issue with getting a reliable source. I don't know what that means as isn't that the point of a Wikipedia page? Vastelland is a country with similar autonomy to Molossia, a micro-nation in Nevada. The main difference between Molossia and Vastelland is popularity. Many people know of Molossia, not many know of Vastelland other than close people (this is due to security issues). Please don't take down my page again, I really want it on here. Thank you - Vastelian Chairman. Vastelian-Chairman (talk) 13:30, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed your post to provide a link to your draft as intended(you has a statement there instead). The draft was not declined "for no reason". You have no independent reliable sources to support the content of your draft. A draft about your micronation must summarize what independent sources choose on their own to say about it. If there are no such sources, it would not merit a Wikipedia article at this time. It doesn't matter if that's because you choose not to otherwise publicize your micronation for security reasons. In any event, Wikipedia is the last place to write about something, not the first, Others need to write about your micronation before there can be an article here to summarize what they say. 331dot (talk) 13:47, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

13:38, 11 March 2024 review of submission by Cooldudeseven7

[edit]

I previously have gotten a notice saying that I do not have a good source, and my article, SuperSKU, got declined. I have added a few sources to resolve this. Is my article worthy of Wikipedia yet? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft%3ASuperSKU Cooldudeseven7 (talk) 13:38, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We don't do pre-review reviews. If you feel that you have addressed the concerns of the reviewer(please also see their note about conflict of interest), you may resubmit it. 331dot (talk) 13:43, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

14:04, 11 March 2024 review of submission by G.B.A.J.Hudson

[edit]

Please would you tell me where I have referenced Wikipedia in this submission G.B.A.J.Hudson (talk) 14:04, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you have now removed the references to Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 14:51, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

16:23, 11 March 2024 review of submission by Fellow22

[edit]

Hello, how can i get a rejected article reviewed again after editing? Fellow22 (talk) 16:23, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Fellow22: normally you can't, that's what rejection means – end of the road. If there are sources which weren't considered earlier and which you believe would establish notability, you may however appeal directly to the reviewer who rejected the draft. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:37, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
okay, thanks for your response Fellow22 (talk) 16:41, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

17:52, 11 March 2024 review of submission by DegenerateCabbage

[edit]

review of submission by DegenerateCabbage Please review this draft for publication. It was made with the help of the translation tool, but it's my first time using it for translating *to* English, so, help is much appreciated. Thank you. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Incident_at_the_Quran_and_Etrat_Clinic_in_Qom DegenerateCabbage (talk) 17:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DegenerateCabbage I fixed the header to provide a link to the draft as intended. You will need to read Referencing for beginners. The Persian Wikipedia likely has different requirements than here, we are usually stricter. 331dot (talk) 18:42, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I just noticed the messed up references. When I translate articles using the translation tool, I just drag and drop the references and it works seamlessly. I wonder why it didn't work here... And of course, that is not acceptable. I would've worked on it, if I wasn't already told that it's not in-depth enough. I understand the point, it's a developing situation. I'll wait for more info, thanks. DegenerateCabbage (talk) 18:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

18:25, 11 March 2024 review of submission by DheimOhss

[edit]

Need help with declined submission for Radio Wolf draft I am trying to understand why my draft submission was declined and how I can improve it. The article is here - Draft:Radio Wolf

The first claim is that their soundtrack release, PROXIMITY, is covered under the wiki page for the artist that they worked with on the project. I feel like since they shared responsibilities in the production of the soundtrack that it should be included in this new wiki page. In fact, Radio Wolf (the topic of my draft) is the person that was contacted to make the album.

The second claim was a bit odd as I referenced 12 other artists that Radio Wolf has worked with in major capacity, such as being producer, on various albums, as well as listed many of his own personal works, so the claim that he isn't separate enough from Parallels is strange. DheimOhss (talk) 18:25, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DheimOhss I fixed the header to provide a link to your draft as intended. He doesn't seem to meet the definition of a notable musician as an individual. 331dot (talk) 18:36, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Would the solution then be to provide better citations for his work? DheimOhss (talk) 18:40, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You need citations that show he meets the notability definition as an individual. Paul McCartney merits a standalone article due to his notable solo career, not because he was part of The Beatles. Which aspect or aspects of the notable musician definition do you claim he meets? 331dot (talk) 18:46, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your help on this, btw. :)
I think the claims I would make are:
- That he is referenced on the IMDB for the soundtrack https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8718300/fullcredits/?ref_=tt_cl_sm as an original song writer, and the album itself won Best Song by the LA Film Awards (which I cited in my original draft). I believe that would be #9 and #10 on the "notable musician" page as it won first place and "performance in a television show or notable film", which the movie is.
- He also satisfies #10 by having his remix of Miss Deringer's "Black Tears" featured in the American TV series, 'How I met Your Mother' DheimOhss (talk) 18:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see (but I may have missed it) an article about something called the "LA Film Awards", so that wouldn't contribute to notability.
10 also says "But if this is the only claim, it is probably more appropriate to have a mention in the main article and redirect to that article."
Even his songwriting (which would fall under WP:COMPOSER) seems to be as part of a team/collaborative effort. I'm not seeing how he is notable as an individual. 331dot (talk) 19:36, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Los Angeles Film Awards are in my citations as #3, here - https://www.lafilmawards.net/single-post/january-2021 That counts as #9 I believe. While #10 does say "if this is the only claim", I think it isn't his only claim as the LA Film Awards satisfies #9 and then #10, either by itself or partially, by the movie soundtrack and the song in a TV series. DheimOhss (talk) 20:17, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
DheimOhss, the LA Film Awards is a non-notable and overtly promotional "pay to play" award business with pretty much no credibility in Hollywood. The filmmakers nominate themselves and pay non-refundable fees to be considered. They give out dozens of these awards every month. Cullen328 (talk) 06:37, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2024_March_11&oldid=1214281074"