Wikipedia:WikiProject James Bond/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to the assessment department of the James Bond WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles about the James Bond, its governments, people, geography, and history. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject James Bond}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:James Bond articles by quality and Category:James Bond articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents

Frequently asked questions[edit]

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the James Bond WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions[edit]

An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WikiProject James Bond}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject James Bond
|class= 
|importance= 
|attention= 
|needs-infobox= 
|peer-review= 
|old-peer-review= 
}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter:

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed James Bond articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

Quality scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance scale[edit]

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of the James Bond.

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.

Status Template Meaning of Status
Top {{Top-Class}} This article is of the utmost importance to this project, as it forms the basis of all information.
High {{High-Class}} This article is fairly important to this project, as it covers a general area of knowledge.
Mid {{Mid-Class}} This article is relatively important to this project, as it fills in some more specific knowledge of certain areas.
Low {{Low-Class}} This article is of little importance to this project, but it covers a highly specific area of knowledge or an obscure piece of trivia.
None None This article is of unknown importance to this project. It remains to be analyzed.

Importance assessment[edit]

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject James Bond}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject James Bond| ... | importance=??? | ...}}
Top
High
Mid
Low
???

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

Requesting an assessment[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

Assessment log[edit]

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.

January 21, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 15, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 9, 2017[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

January 6, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 5, 2017[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Sylvia Trench (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from NA-Class to Unknown-Class (rev · t).

December 30, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Young Bond (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

November 12, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 4, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 2, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 2, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • 006 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as NA-Class (rev · t).

September 28, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 27, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Alec Trevelyan (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from NA-Class to Unknown-Class (rev · t).

September 21, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 18, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 17, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 1, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Joseph Furst (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

August 21, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 18, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

July 26, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

July 24, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Alec Trevelyan (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to NA-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).
  • Christmas Jones (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to NA-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Mid-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).
  • Elliot Carver (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to NA-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Mid-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).
  • Franz Sanchez (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to NA-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Mid-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).
  • Mary Goodnight (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).

July 18, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

July 9, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Elektra King (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to NA-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Mid-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).

July 8, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

July 6, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Alec Trevelyan (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from NA-Class to Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • Mary Goodnight (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from NA-Class to Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • Shaun Campbell (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Disambig-Class (rev · t).

June 29, 2016[edit]

Renamed[edit]

June 28, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Soon-Tek Oh (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t).

June 27, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

June 15, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Sheena Easton (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).

May 30, 2016[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 15, 2016[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 9, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 8, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 6, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 3, 2016[edit]

Removed[edit]

April 18, 2016[edit]

Removed[edit]

April 11, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Joseph Furst (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

April 9, 2016[edit]

Removed[edit]

April 1, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

February 29, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

February 20, 2016[edit]

Removed[edit]

February 16, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

  • :Bond 25 (talk) removed. Quality rating was GA-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).

February 14, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 7, 2016[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • :Bond 25 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as GA-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

January 29, 2016[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Spectre (song) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

January 6, 2016[edit]

Removed[edit]

January 3, 2016[edit]

Removed[edit]

December 26, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Spectre (song) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

December 21, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

December 13, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

December 10, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

December 7, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • 007 Bond (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Top-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).
  • 007 James Bond (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Top-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).
  • Bond OO7 (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Top-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).
  • OO7 Bond (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Top-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).
  • OO7 James Bond (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Top-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).

December 3, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

December 1, 2015[edit]

Removed[edit]

November 19, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

November 18, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • 007 Bond (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Top-Class (rev · t).
  • 007 James Bond (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Top-Class (rev · t).
  • Bond OO7 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Top-Class (rev · t).
  • OO7 Bond (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Top-Class (rev · t).
  • OO7 James Bond (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Top-Class (rev · t).

November 11, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 9, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

November 8, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

November 7, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 6, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 1, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 23, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Sheena Easton (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • Shirley Bassey (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

October 6, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 29, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 21, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 14, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 13, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 8, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 4, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

August 24, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

August 19, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Cold (novel) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Mid-Class (rev · t).

Removed[edit]

August 4, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 3, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Worklist[edit]

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

This page was once used by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team. It is preserved because of the information in its edit history. This page should not be edited or deleted. Wikiproject article lists can be generated using the WP 1.0 web tool.